| Behaviour | What has to be true for it |
|---|---|
| Handwashing with soap | Soap, water, a cue, a habit |
| Toilet use | A working toilet, and a norm |
| Antenatal care | A service, transport, permission |
| Immunisation | A session held, a trusted worker |
| BCC assumed | SBCC adds |
|---|---|
| The individual decides | Families and norms decide too |
| Information is the gap | Services and access matter |
| Messages persuade | Environments enable |
| One audience | Several, including gatekeepers |
| Step | What usually stops it |
|---|---|
| Awareness to knowledge | The message was vague |
| Knowledge to intention | No perceived benefit; norms against |
| Intention to action | Friction, forgetting, cost |
| Action to maintenance | No cue; no reinforcement |
| Where people fall away | The design question it raises |
|---|---|
| Awareness to knowledge | Was the message specific? |
| Intention to action | What is the friction? |
| Misconception | Why it persists |
|---|---|
| More posters means more change | Output is countable |
| A one-off campaign works | It fits a project cycle |
| People are ignorant | It requires nothing of the programme |
| Mass media is enough | It is visible to funders |
| Message fails without | Which is |
|---|---|
| Soap and water nearby | Supply |
| A held immunisation session | Service delivery |
| A friendly, present nurse | Service quality |
| A toilet that works | Infrastructure |
| Permission to travel | Social |
| Knowledge is | Knowledge is not |
|---|---|
| Necessary | Sufficient |
| Cheap to deliver | The usual binding constraint |
| Easy to measure | What you are trying to change |
| Gap | What closes it |
|---|---|
| Knowledge gap | Information, demonstration |
| Attitude gap | Benefit framing, emotion |
| Norm gap | Visible social proof |
| Intention-action gap | Cues, defaults, reduced friction |
| Between intention and action sit | Addressed by |
|---|---|
| Forgetting | A timely reminder |
| Friction | Removing a step |
| Why intentions fail | What to do about it |
|---|---|
| Forgetting | A cue at the moment |
| Friction | Remove a step |
| Habit | Attach the new act to an existing routine |
| Present bias | Make the benefit immediate or visible |
| Competing demands | Reduce the time cost |
| Behaviour | Who is watching |
|---|---|
| Antenatal visit | The mother-in-law; neighbours |
| Vasectomy | Male peers; the wider family |
| Menstrual hygiene | Household elders |
| Toilet use | The whole hamlet |
| Structural barrier | Communication cannot |
|---|---|
| No toilet | Build one |
| Absent nurse | Staff the clinic |
| Four-hour walk | Shorten the distance |
| A lost day’s wage | Replace the income |
| If ability is | And motivation is | Then |
|---|---|---|
| Low | High | Behaviour still fails |
| High | Low | Behaviour often succeeds |
| Low | Low | Fix ability first |
| High | High | It happens |
| Design step | Common shortcut |
|---|---|
| Find the real barrier | Assume it is knowledge |
| Separate the gaps | Treat them as one |
| Address norms | Address individuals |
| Flag structural blocks | Message around them |
| Make it easy | Make it desired |
| A theory tells you | It does not tell you |
|---|---|
| Which lever to pull | Which is weak in your context |
| What predicts the behaviour | What your audience believes |
| Where to probe in research | The answer |
| Construct | The question in the person's head |
|---|---|
| Perceived susceptibility | Could this happen to me? |
| Perceived severity | Would it be serious if it did? |
| Perceived benefits | Will this action actually help? |
| Perceived barriers | What will it cost me to act? |
| Cues to action | What prompts me to do it now? |
| Self-efficacy | Can I actually do it? |
| HBM construct | The question it asks |
|---|---|
| Perceived susceptibility | Could this happen to me? |
| Perceived benefits | Would acting help? |
| Perceived barriers | What would it cost me? |
| Ask the mother | Rather than telling her |
|---|---|
| Do you think complications could affect you? | Complications are dangerous |
| Would a check-up help? | Check-ups are important |
| What would it cost you to go? | Please attend |
| Who decides whether you go? | It is your health |
| TPB component | Ask | If weak |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude | Do I think it is good? | Show the benefit |
| Subjective norm | Do respected others approve? | Show social proof |
| Perceived control | Can I actually do it? | Demonstrate; simplify |
| If the weak lever is | The message should |
|---|---|
| Attitude | Show the benefit, vividly |
| Norms | Show respected others doing it |
| Control | Demonstrate; simplify; reassure |
| Stage | Wrong message for it |
|---|---|
| Precontemplation | A detailed how-to |
| Contemplation | More facts |
| Stage | Where the person is | Communication job |
|---|---|---|
| Precontemplation | Not even considering change | Raise awareness, plant doubt |
| Contemplation | Weighing pros and cons | Tip the balance; show benefits |
| Preparation | Intending to act soon | Give a concrete plan and skills |
| Action | Doing it, recently started | Reinforce, reward, problem-solve |
| Maintenance | Sustaining the new behaviour | Prevent relapse, build habit |
| Stage | Communication job | Channel that suits |
|---|---|---|
| Precontemplation | Raise awareness; plant doubt | Mass media |
| Contemplation | Tip the balance | Mid-media, peers |
| Preparation | Give the how and the where | Interpersonal |
| Action | Support and reduce friction | Interpersonal, cues |
| Maintenance | Reinforce; make it normal | Community, norms |
| Take from | The construct |
|---|---|
| HBM | Perceived barriers and benefits |
| TPB | Subjective norms and control |
| Stages of change | Readiness varies |
| Social cognitive theory | Self-efficacy and modelling |
| COM-B | A diagnostic checklist |
| Layer | Example lever |
|---|---|
| Individual | Knowledge, efficacy |
| Family and peers | Gatekeeper permission |
| Bandura’s mechanism | Design implication |
|---|---|
| People learn by observing | Show the behaviour being done |
| Especially similar others | Use relatable models, not celebrities |
| Rewarded behaviour is copied | Show the reward |
| Person, behaviour and environment interact | Change more than the person |
| Self-efficacy is raised by | Not by |
|---|---|
| Doing it successfully once | Being told it is easy |
| Seeing someone similar do it | Seeing an expert do it |
| Encouragement from a trusted person | General exhortation |
| Breaking it into small steps | Presenting the whole task |
| Group | Rough share | What they need |
|---|---|---|
| Early adopters | A small minority | Status; being first |
| Early majority | About a third | Proof from peers |
| Adopter group | What moves them |
|---|---|
| Innovators | Novelty; low risk aversion |
| Early adopters | Being first; status |
| Early majority | Proof from people like them |
| Late majority | Norms; it is now expected |
| Laggards | Structural support, or nothing |
| Descriptive norm | Injunctive norm | |
|---|---|---|
| States | What people do | What people approve of |
| Example | "Everyone defecates in the open" | "Respectable families use a toilet" |
| Risk | Can reinforce the bad behaviour | Can shame |
| Norm-shifting device | How it works |
|---|---|
| Public commitment | Makes the new intention visible |
| Community declaration | Changes what is expected of everyone |
| Visible markers | Signal who has changed |
| Collective action | Removes the cost of being first |
| Classical assumption | What actually happens |
|---|---|
| People weigh costs and benefits | They use shortcuts |
| Preferences are stable | Framing changes them |
| More options are better | Choice overload |
| Information changes decisions | Context often matters more |
| Component | Missing means |
|---|---|
| Capability | They cannot, even if willing |
| Opportunity | The context blocks it |
| Motivation | They will not, even if able |
| Component | Ask | If missing, then… |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | Do they know how & feel able? | Teach, demonstrate, build skills |
| Opportunity | Does the environment allow it? | Fix access, cues, norms, time |
| Motivation | Do they want to, in the moment? | Reasons, emotion, habit, incentives |
| Component | Diagnostic question | If missing |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | Do they know how, and feel able? | Teach; demonstrate |
| Opportunity | Does the context allow it? | Fix access, cues, norms |
| Motivation | Do they want to, in the moment? | Framing, incentives, habit |
| Bias | Design response |
|---|---|
| Present bias | Bring the benefit forward; make the cost later |
| Loss aversion | Frame as avoiding a loss |
| Status quo bias | Change the default |
| Social proof | Show what similar others do |
| Availability | Make the relevant case vivid |
| Nudge type | Example in a programme |
|---|---|
| Default | Opt-out enrolment in a scheme |
| Framing | "90% protected" rather than "10% at risk" |
| Commitment | A signed pledge at a village meeting |
| Reminder | An SMS the day before the session |
| Simplification | A one-page form instead of four |
| Choice architecture element | Who currently designed it |
|---|---|
| The default | Whoever wrote the form |
| The order of options | Nobody, usually |
| The friction at each step | The bureaucracy |
| What is salient | Accident |
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Easy | Reduce friction; use simple defaults and clear steps |
| Attractive | Draw attention; make it personal and appealing |
| Social | Show that others are doing it; harness norms |
| Timely | Prompt at the moment people are most receptive |
| EAST | The test |
|---|---|
| Easy | Have you removed a step? |
| Attractive | Does it draw attention? |
| Social | Does it show what others do? |
| Timely | Does it arrive at the decision moment? |
| Nudges can | Nudges cannot |
|---|---|
| Close an intention-action gap | Supply a missing service |
| Raise uptake at the margin | Overcome a structural barrier |
| Be cheap and scalable | Substitute for infrastructure |
| Work quietly | Be used without transparency |
| In one village, the audience includes | Who sees the behaviour as |
|---|---|
| A new mother | Her own decision, partly |
| Her mother-in-law | A family decision |
| The ASHA | Her target and her workload |
| The village head | A programme in his area |
| The absent husband | Something he pays for |
| Segment by | When it matters |
|---|---|
| Barrier faced | Always — the most useful cut |
| Stage of readiness | When the audience is mixed |
| Role (doer, gatekeeper) | When permission is the constraint |
| Media access | When designing the mix |
| Audience | Example, antenatal care |
|---|---|
| Primary | The pregnant woman |
| Secondary | Mother-in-law, husband |
| Influencing | ASHA, panchayat, block officer |
| Gatekeeper | What would move them |
|---|---|
| Mother-in-law | Status; a healthy grandchild; her own experience honoured |
| Husband | Cost; time away from work; his role named |
| Elder or village head | Community standing; being consulted |
| Frontline worker | Workload; recognition; a workable process |
| Barrier | Motivator that can outweigh it |
|---|---|
| Lost wages | A visible benefit to the child |
| Fear of the facility | A trusted, familiar worker |
| Family disapproval | Approval shown by respected others |
| Low self-efficacy | Seeing a peer succeed |
| A persona needs | Not |
|---|---|
| A name and an age | A demographic bracket |
| A routine, hour by hour | A list of attributes |
| One specific barrier | A summary of all barriers |
| One motivator, in her words | A programme objective |
| Weak insight | Strong insight |
|---|---|
| Mothers lack awareness | She has heard it and does not believe it applies to her |
| People do not value hygiene | A clean house is a matter of pride; hands are not part of it |
| Uptake is low | Going means admitting to her mother-in-law that she is unsure |
| Formative research answers | Before you |
|---|---|
| What do people actually do? | Assume the gap |
| Why? | Choose a theory |
| What would move them? | Write a message |
| Who do they trust? | Pick a messenger |
| What words do they use? | Draft any copy |
| Question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Who already does it? | They are your models |
| What is the real barrier? | It decides the message |
| Who do they trust? | It decides the messenger |
| What words do they use? | It decides the copy |
| What channels do they use? | It decides the mix |
| Method | Good for | Note |
|---|---|---|
| In-depth interviews | Personal, sensitive behaviours | Rich, but small numbers |
| Focus group discussions | Norms, shared language, reactions | Beware dominant voices |
| Observation | What people actually do vs say | Reveals the say-do gap |
| Trials of improved practices | Testing a behaviour in real homes | Households try, then report |
| Quick surveys | Rough prevalence & segments | Sizing, not deep 'why' |
| Method | Best for | Watch |
|---|---|---|
| In-depth interviews | Sensitive, personal behaviour | Small numbers |
| Focus groups | Norms and shared language | Dominant voices |
| Observation | What people do, not say | Observer effect |
| Free listing / ranking | Local categories and priorities | Needs skilled facilitation |
| Quick survey | How common, and where | Cannot explain why |
| Barrier analysis step | Output |
|---|---|
| Pick one specific behaviour | A definable act |
| Interview doers and non-doers | Two comparable groups |
| Compare their beliefs | Which differ significantly |
| Rank the differences | The barriers that matter |
| Design against the top ones | A targeted message |
| Ask both groups about | Because the difference is the lever |
|---|---|
| Perceived benefit | Doers may see one non-doers do not |
| Perceived barrier | Non-doers may face a specific cost |
| Social approval | Who supports each group |
| Self-efficacy | Whether they believe they can |
| Cues | What prompted the doers |
| Weak question | Better question |
|---|---|
| Do you know ORS treats dehydration? | What did you give last time, and why? |
| Is immunisation important? | Who decides whether the child goes? |
| Do you wash your hands? | Show me where you wash them |
| Qualitative tells you | Quantitative tells you |
|---|---|
| Why | How many |
| The mechanism | Where it is worst |
| The language | Which segment to prioritise |
| The barrier | How big the gap is |
| A SOCO names | Example |
|---|---|
| One audience | First-time mothers, 18-25 |
| One behaviour | Attend the first antenatal visit |
| One change | By the end of the first trimester |
| One reason | Because it protects the baby |
| One poster carrying | Audience remembers |
|---|---|
| One behaviour | That behaviour |
| Three behaviours | Perhaps one |
| Five behaviours | None |
| A logo and five behaviours | The logo |
| Rational appeal supplies | Emotional appeal supplies |
|---|---|
| The reason it works | The reason to care |
| Credibility | Memorability |
| What to do | Why it matters to me |
| Fear works when | Fear fails when |
|---|---|
| Paired with a doable action | The action is unclear |
| The threat feels personal | It feels remote |
| Self-efficacy is high | People feel helpless |
| Used sparingly | It is the whole campaign |
| Quality | Test |
|---|---|
| Simple | Can it be repeated after one hearing? |
| Concrete | Does it name a specific action? |
| Credible | Would this audience believe this source? |
| Emotional | Does it make anyone feel something? |
| Story-shaped | Is there a person and a change? |
| Messenger | Best for |
|---|---|
| A relatable neighbour who has done it | Everyday behaviours |
| A frontline worker | Advice, and answering doubts |
| A respected elder | Norm change and permission |
| A celebrity | Attention and reach, not persuasion |
| An official | Legitimacy; rarely persuasion |
| Pretest for | A failing result |
|---|---|
| Comprehension | They read a different meaning |
| Attractiveness | They do not look |
| Acceptability | It offends or embarrasses |
| Persuasion | They understand and would not act |
| Self-reference | "That is not about people like me" |
| Vague ask | Doable ask |
|---|---|
| Be healthier | Take your baby for the 9-month measles shot |
| Practise good hygiene | Wash with soap before feeding your child |
| Seek care early | Go to the sub-centre on Tuesday morning |
| Use a toilet | Use the toilet at the end of your lane |
| Channel | Reach | Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Mass media | Millions | Shallow |
| Mid-media | Hundreds per event | Moderate |
| Family | Examples | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Mass media | TV, radio, print, outdoor | Wide reach, awareness, norms |
| Mid-media / folk | Street theatre, melas, wall art | Local, engaging, trusted |
| Interpersonal | FLWs, counselling, peer groups | Deep, tailored, persuasive |
| Digital / mobile | SMS, IVR, WhatsApp, social | Targeted, two-way, cheap |
| Family | Does well | Does badly |
|---|---|---|
| Mass media | Reach; setting norms | Persuasion; tailoring |
| Mid-media / folk | Local credibility; attention | Scale; consistency |
| Interpersonal | Persuasion; doubts | Reach; cost |
| Digital | Timeliness; two-way | Reaching those without phones |
| Mass media is unbeatable for | And weak at |
|---|---|
| Reaching the less literate | Answering a doubt |
| Signalling a new normal | Tailoring to a segment |
| Sustaining recall | Demonstrating a skill |
| Legitimising a behaviour | Closing the intention-action gap |
| Mid-media form | Its particular strength |
|---|---|
| Nukkad natak | Gathers a crowd; handles taboo through humour |
| Puppet shows | Reaches children and mixed audiences |
| Folk song | Memorable; travels without you |
| Video van | Brings audiovisual where there is no screen |
| Wall painting | Persistent; a standing cue |
| IPC allows | Which mass media cannot |
|---|---|
| Questions and doubts | Two-way exchange |
| Tailoring to this person | Segment of one |
| Demonstration | Watching someone try |
| Trust built over visits | Relationship |
| Collective form | What it adds |
|---|---|
| Women’s collectives | Peer support and a shared norm |
| Self-help groups | An existing, trusted platform |
| Village health and sanitation committees | A link to the service |
| Public declarations | Visible commitment |
| Digital channel | Best use | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| SMS reminder | Timely prompt | Literacy; number ownership |
| IVR | Reaching non-readers | Completion rates |
| WhatsApp group | Peer reinforcement | Who is in the group |
| Social media | Younger, urban segments | Not the whole audience |
| Match the channel to | By asking |
|---|---|
| The audience | What do they actually use and trust? |
| The job | Awareness, or persuasion? |
| The stage | Where in the journey are they? |
| The moment | When is the decision made? |
| Cycle stage | What feeds back |
|---|---|
| Analyse | Monitoring data from the last round |
| Design | Pretest findings |
| Develop and pretest | Audience comprehension |
| Implement | Field reports on reception |
| Monitor and evaluate | Into the next analysis |
| A strategy states | Before |
|---|---|
| The behaviour | Anyone writes copy |
| The audiences and barriers | Media is bought |
| The SOCO | The creative brief |
| The channels and messengers | The budget is split |
| The indicators | Anything is produced |
| Told to | Decided for themselves |
|---|---|
| Compliance while watched | Change that holds |
| Resentment at being lectured | Ownership |
| The programme owns it | The community owns it |
| CLTS abandons | In favour of |
|---|---|
| Individual subsidy | Collective decision |
| Lecturing about germs | Community self-appraisal |
| Household targeting | Whole-community status |
| Outside expertise | Local facilitation |
| Entertainment-education works because | Not because |
|---|---|
| Audiences identify with characters | The message is repeated |
| Characters model the behaviour | The information is new |
| Consequences are seen | It is entertaining alone |
| It is voluntarily watched | It is broadcast widely |
| ASHA-led IPC gives you | And costs |
|---|---|
| The last mile, into homes | Her time, already committed |
| A familiar face and local idiom | Training and supervision |
| Two-way conversation | Consistency across a million workers |
| Repeat contact | Incentive alignment |
| Group work adds | Beyond individual counselling |
|---|---|
| Peer support through the change | Which sustains it |
| A shared norm in the room | Which lowers the cost of being first |
| Collective problem-solving | Which surfaces local barriers |
| Accountability | Which maintains the behaviour |
| To sustain change | Because |
|---|---|
| Repeat and reinforce | One burst does not stick |
| Build local ownership | The project will end |
| Make the behaviour visible | Norms need evidence |
| Remove the friction | Motivation decays; ease does not |
| Celebrate progress | It signals the new normal |
| Level | What it proves |
|---|---|
| Outputs | You spent the money |
| Reach | People could have seen it |
| Exposure | They did see it |
| Knowledge and attitude | It landed |
| Behaviour | It worked |
| Level | Example indicator |
|---|---|
| Exposure | % who recall the campaign message |
| Knowledge | % who correctly state when to use ORS |
| Attitude / norm | % who believe neighbours approve of toilets |
| Intention | % who intend to immunise their child |
| Behaviour | % of children fully immunised |
| Level | Indicator | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure | % recalling the message | Survey |
| Knowledge | % stating when to use ORS | Survey |
| Norm | % believing neighbours approve | Survey |
| Intention | % intending to immunise | Survey |
| Behaviour | % who actually did | Survey or records |
| Old approach | What worked instead |
|---|---|
| Explain germs | Tie the act to specific moments |
| General hygiene messages | After the toilet; before feeding |
| Mission Indradhanush paired | Which addressed |
|---|---|
| Service delivery drives | Opportunity |
| ASHA mobilisation | Interpersonal persuasion |
| Local influencers | Norms and permission |
| Rumour response | Specific, live barriers |
| Swachh Bharat combined | Contested on |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure at scale | Quality and usability of construction |
| Mass media and celebrity | Reach versus depth |
| CLTS-style triggering | Coercion and shaming reports |
| ODF declarations | Verification and sustained use |
| Why ORS promotion worked | Feature |
|---|---|
| One simple behaviour | Specific and doable |
| Low cost, home-based | Little friction |
| Consistent message over decades | Repetition |
| Multiple channels, sustained | Mix and persistence |
| Ethical rule | Failing practice |
|---|---|
| No stigma | Shaming those who cannot comply |
| Truthfulness | Exaggerated fear; false promises |
| Respect autonomy | Coercion dressed as motivation |
| Do no harm | Messages that endanger a woman at home |
| Be transparent | Concealed persuasion techniques |
| Trap | What went wrong |
|---|---|
| Stigma trap | Shaming those who lack means, not will |
| Norm trap | "Most people still don’t" normalises it |
| Fear trap | Threat without a doable action |
| Blame trap | Making the individual responsible for a structural gap |
| Read | For |
|---|---|
| Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations | How practices spread |
| Cialdini, Influence | Norms and social proof |
| Thaler and Sunstein; EAST | Nudges, practically |
| Michie, Behaviour Change Wheel | COM-B as a diagnostic |
| Johns Hopkins CCP materials | SBCC practice guidance |