| Term | What it counts |
|---|---|
| Maternal death | Death while pregnant or within 42 days of the pregnancy ending, from a cause related to or aggravated by it |
| Late maternal death | The same, but 42 days to one year — increasingly counted, historically invisible |
| Pregnancy-related death | Any death in that window, including accidents — easier to measure, less specific |
| Measure | Denominator | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| MMR (ratio) | Per 100,000 live births | How dangerous is a pregnancy here? |
| Maternal mortality rate | Per 100,000 women 15–49 | How much maternal death does this population carry? |
| Lifetime risk | Per woman | Cumulative risk across a whole reproductive life |
| Right | What it obliges the state to do |
|---|---|
| Life & health | Provide emergency obstetric care that is actually reachable |
| Non-discrimination | Close gaps by caste, poverty and district, not just raise the average |
| Information | Danger signs, entitlements and what a facility must provide free |
| Consent & dignity | No procedure without consent; no abuse or refusal of care |
| SDG 3.1 component | The target |
|---|---|
| Global average MMR | Below 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 |
| National floor | No country above 140 — twice the global target |
| Sub-national | Not in the target, and where the real gaps sit |
| Complication | The remedy | Age of the remedy |
|---|---|---|
| Postpartum haemorrhage | Oxytocin at delivery; blood | In use since the 1950s |
| Eclampsia | Magnesium sulphate | Confirmed superior by the MAGPIE trial, 2002 |
| Sepsis | Clean delivery; antibiotics | Semmelweis, 1847; antibiotics from the 1940s |
| Obstructed labour | Timely caesarean | Routine since the early 20th century |
| Level of comparison | Typical spread |
|---|---|
| Between world regions | Sub-Saharan Africa carries the highest regional MMR by a wide margin |
| Between Indian states | Kerala near 20; the highest-burden states above 150 (SRS 2019–21) |
| Between districts in one state | Often wider than the state-to-state gap |
| Between wealth quintiles | The poorest fifth lags on every stage of the continuum |
| Section | The question it answers |
|---|---|
| Why mothers die | What is the clinical cause, direct and indirect? |
| The three delays | Where in the system did the time go? |
| The continuum of care | Which stage did she fall out of? |
| Programmes & equity | What is the state doing, and for whom is it not working? |
| Direct | Indirect | |
|---|---|---|
| Arises from | The pregnancy itself or its management | A condition the pregnancy worsens |
| Examples | Haemorrhage, sepsis, eclampsia, obstructed labour | Anaemia, heart disease, TB, diabetes, hepatitis |
| Responds to | Obstetric care at the right moment | Care across the whole life course |
| Trend as systems improve | Falls first | Becomes the larger share of what remains |
| Direct cause | Approximate global share |
|---|---|
| Haemorrhage | About a quarter — the largest single cause |
| Hypertensive disorders | Roughly one in seven |
| Sepsis | About one in ten |
| Unsafe abortion | Close to one in twelve, and avoidable outright |
| PPH response | Time available |
|---|---|
| Uterotonic within one minute of birth | Preventive — before bleeding starts |
| Recognise and call for help | Minutes |
| Uterine massage, controlled cord traction | Minutes |
| Reach blood transfusion | Under two hours, often less |
| Stage | Sign | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-eclampsia | BP raised, protein in urine | Detected at ANC; monitor, treat, plan delivery |
| Severe pre-eclampsia | Headache, visual changes, upper abdominal pain | MgSO₄ and referral |
| Eclampsia | Convulsions | MgSO₄, stabilise, deliver |
| The six cleans | Prevents |
|---|---|
| Clean hands | Introducing infection during examination and delivery |
| Clean delivery surface | Contamination at the moment of birth |
| Clean blade | Cord infection and neonatal tetanus |
| Clean cord tie and clean cord stump | The commonest route into a newborn |
| Clean perineum | Puerperal sepsis in the mother |
| Complication | If treated in time | If not |
|---|---|---|
| Obstructed labour | Caesarean; mother and baby survive | Uterine rupture, death, or obstetric fistula and lifelong incontinence |
| Unsafe abortion | Does not arise — safe services exist | Sepsis, haemorrhage, perforation, death |
| Anaemia severity | Haemoglobin | Consequence in pregnancy |
|---|---|---|
| Mild | 10.0–10.9 g/dL | Fatigue; reduced reserve for blood loss |
| Moderate | 7.0–9.9 g/dL | Preterm birth, low birthweight, poor tolerance of haemorrhage |
| Severe | Below 7.0 g/dL | Heart failure; a routine blood loss becomes fatal |
| Window | What kills | What is needed |
|---|---|---|
| Labour and delivery | Obstructed labour, eclampsia | A skilled attendant; a theatre within reach |
| First 24 hours | Postpartum haemorrhage | Uterotonic at birth; observation; blood |
| First week | Sepsis, late haemorrhage | Postnatal contact, not early discharge |
| Up to 42 days | Sepsis, indirect causes | Home visits and a route back into care |
| Delay | Located in | Who can act on it |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Deciding to seek care | The household | ASHA, community, the woman herself |
| 2. Reaching a facility | The road and the transport system | District administration, referral transport |
| 3. Receiving adequate care | The facility | Health system managers, clinicians |
| Why the decision stalls | What shortens it |
|---|---|
| Danger signs read as normal discomfort | Danger-sign counselling at every ANC contact |
| The woman cannot decide alone | Counselling that includes husbands and mothers-in-law |
| Fear of the bill | JSSK entitlements, made known before labour |
| Distrust of how she will be treated | Respectful care — the strongest determinant of return |
| Barrier | What actually fixes it |
|---|---|
| No vehicle at 2 a.m. | A dispatch system that answers at night — 102 / 108 |
| No money for transport | Free referral transport under JSSK, both ways |
| Distance and terrain | Birth-waiting homes near the referral facility |
| Referred onward from the first facility | Correct routing at the start — not the nearest, the capable |
| Inside the facility | The failure |
|---|---|
| Staffing | No one on duty who can manage the complication, on that shift |
| Drugs | Oxytocin or MgSO₄ out of stock, or out of cold chain |
| Blood | No functioning bank, or no matched unit |
| Theatre | No anaesthetist — the commonest reason a caesarean waits |
| Process | Admission paperwork, informal payment, decision by someone absent |
| Framing | Question it asks | What it produces |
|---|---|---|
| Medical | What was the cause of death? | A cause on a certificate |
| Three delays | Where did the time go? | A list of system failures with owners |
| Delay | Root cause | What helps |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Deciding | Awareness, cost, gender norms | ASHA outreach, danger-sign education, cash incentives |
| 2. Reaching | Distance, transport | Referral ambulances (e.g. 102/108), birth-waiting homes |
| 3. Receiving | Facility readiness | EmONC, staff, drugs, blood, free entitlements |
| Delay | India’s instrument | Its limit |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Deciding | ASHA outreach; JSY cash incentive | Cash cannot buy quality once she arrives |
| 2. Reaching | Free referral transport, 102 / 108; JSSK | Dispatch and night coverage vary widely |
| 3. Receiving | EmONC, LaQshya, SUMAN, free entitlements | Depends on staffing that money alone cannot fix |
| Death review question | Delay it interrogates |
|---|---|
| When did the family first notice something wrong? | Delay 1 — recognition |
| How long between noticing and leaving? | Delay 1 — decision |
| How long was the journey, and how many stops? | Delay 2 |
| How long from arrival to first treatment? | Delay 3 |
| What was missing when it was needed? | Delay 3 — readiness |
| Handover | Where women fall out |
|---|---|
| Pregnancy → birth | ANC attended, delivery at home unattended |
| Birth → postnatal | Discharged within hours; no contact in the fatal window |
| Postnatal → family planning | No counselling; next pregnancy too soon |
| Mother → newborn | The baby is never separately examined |
| Stage | The risk it manages | If skipped |
|---|---|---|
| Antenatal | Anaemia, hypertension, malpresentation | Silent risks arrive as emergencies |
| Skilled birth | Haemorrhage, eclampsia, obstruction | The most dangerous hours are unattended |
| Postnatal | PPH, sepsis, newborn danger signs | Deaths occur at home, uncounted |
| Newborn | Asphyxia, hypothermia, infection | Most newborn deaths are in the first week |
| Dimension | Breaks when |
|---|---|
| Across time | A stage is skipped — ANC without a skilled birth, birth without postnatal contact |
| Across place | The referral link fails — no transport, no slot, no record travelling with her |
| Coverage figure | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|
| 4+ ANC visits | Whether BP and haemoglobin were actually measured |
| Institutional delivery | Whether the facility could manage a complication |
| Postnatal contact | Whether it happened inside the first 48 hours |
| Any single stage | Whether the same women received all of them |
| Cadre | Role | Based at |
|---|---|---|
| ASHA | Mobiliser, accompanies women, follow-up | Village |
| ANM | Antenatal checks, immunisation, deliveries | Sub-centre / HWC |
| Staff nurse / SBA | Skilled birth attendance | PHC / CHC |
| Medical officer | Complications, caesarean (where trained) | CHC / hospital |
| Specialist (Ob-Gyn) | Comprehensive emergency care | District hospital |
| Cadre | Employment | Paid how |
|---|---|---|
| ASHA | Volunteer, not salaried staff | Task-based incentives per activity completed |
| ANM | Government staff | Salary |
| Staff nurse / SBA | Facility staff | Salary |
| Medical officer, specialist | Facility staff | Salary |
| Tier | Should handle | Refers up when |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-centre / HWC | ANC, normal birth, postnatal | Any danger sign appears |
| PHC | Basic EmONC — the seven signal functions | Caesarean or transfusion needed |
| CHC / FRU | Comprehensive EmONC: surgery and blood | ICU or specialist newborn care needed |
| District hospital | Full specialist and newborn care | Rarely |
| Stage | Deaths it removes |
|---|---|
| Antenatal care | Eclampsia and anaemia-driven deaths, caught early |
| Skilled birth | Haemorrhage, obstruction — the labour-window deaths |
| Postnatal care | Late PPH and sepsis, in the window after discharge |
| Newborn care | Asphyxia, hypothermia, infection in the first week |
| ANC finds | Before it becomes |
|---|---|
| Raised BP and protein in urine | Eclampsia in labour |
| Low haemoglobin | A survivable blood loss turning fatal |
| Malpresentation, previous caesarean | Obstructed labour or rupture |
| Syphilis, HIV, hepatitis B | Transmission to the newborn |
| Gestational diabetes | Macrosomia and obstructed labour |
| Old model (4 visits) | WHO 2016 (8 contacts) | |
|---|---|---|
| First contact | Often second trimester | Before 12 weeks |
| Spacing | 4 visits, mostly late | Contacts across all three trimesters |
| Framing | Risk screening | Screening plus a positive pregnancy experience |
| Wording | "Visit" | "Contact" — includes community-based care |
| Indicator (NFHS-5, 2019–21) | India |
|---|---|
| At least four ANC visits | About 58% of mothers |
| First trimester ANC registration | Around seven in ten |
| Full ANC (4 visits, IFA, TT) | A much smaller minority |
| Danger sign | Points to |
|---|---|
| Vaginal bleeding | Antepartum or postpartum haemorrhage |
| Severe headache, blurred vision, upper abdominal pain | Severe pre-eclampsia |
| Convulsions | Eclampsia — immediate MgSO₄ and referral |
| High fever, foul discharge | Sepsis |
| Reduced fetal movement, leaking fluid | Fetal distress, premature rupture |
| Anaemia in India (NFHS-5) | Share |
|---|---|
| Pregnant women 15–49 | About 52% |
| All women 15–49 | About 57% |
| Children 6–59 months | About 67% |
| Why IFA fails in practice | What helps |
|---|---|
| Nausea and constipation | Counselling on timing; taking it with food |
| Stopped after feeling better | Explaining it treats a silent condition |
| Stockouts at the sub-centre | Supply monitoring, not just prescription counts |
| Tablets counted as distributed, never taken | Consumption tracked, not distribution |
| Before TT at scale | After | |
|---|---|---|
| Neonatal tetanus | A major cause of newborn death | Eliminated as a public-health problem in India, validated 2015 |
| Route of infection | Unclean cord-cutting at home births | Clean delivery plus maternal immunity |
| Component | Skipped when |
|---|---|
| Blood pressure | No working cuff, or a queue too long for it |
| Haemoglobin | No test strips; result not acted on |
| Urine protein | Dipsticks out of stock |
| Fetal growth and position | No trained provider that session |
| Birth planning and danger signs | No time — the first thing dropped |
| Attendant | Can manage | Can refer with stabilisation |
|---|---|---|
| Skilled birth attendant | Normal birth; initial management of PPH, eclampsia | Yes — uterotonic, MgSO₄, first-line care |
| Traditional birth attendant | Normal birth, sometimes well | No clinical stabilisation |
| No attendant | Nothing | No |
| Setting | Delay 1 | Delay 2 | Delay 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home, unattended | Full | Full — begins after the emergency | Full |
| Home, skilled attendant | Reduced | Still full | Partial |
| Facility birth | Already resolved | Already resolved | The only one left |
| Institutional delivery, India | Share of births |
|---|---|
| NFHS-3 (2005–06) | About 39% |
| NFHS-4 (2015–16) | About 79% |
| NFHS-5 (2019–21) | About 89% |
| JSY design element | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Cash to the mother | Covers transport, wages lost, incidental costs |
| Conditional on facility birth | Buys the behaviour that removes delays 1 and 2 |
| ASHA incentive for accompaniment | Gives someone an interest in the woman arriving |
| Higher amounts in low-performing states | Targets where the gap is largest |
| What JSY can buy | What it cannot |
|---|---|
| The journey and the decision | An anaesthetist on night duty |
| A woman’s arrival at a facility | Oxytocin in stock when she bleeds |
| Higher coverage statistics | Respectful treatment once she is there |
| JSSK entitlement | The charge it removes |
|---|---|
| Free delivery, including caesarean | The largest single bill |
| Free drugs and consumables | Prescriptions sent to outside chemists |
| Free diagnostics and blood | Tests and units billed privately |
| Free transport, both ways and between facilities | The cost of getting there and home |
| Free diet during the stay | Food bought by the family |
| JSY (2005) | JSSK (2011) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | Cash incentive to the woman | Free services, no charges |
| Barrier addressed | Decision & cost of coming | Cost incurred at facility |
| Type | Demand-side (conditional cash) | Supply-side entitlement |
| Together | Get her to come | Make sure it costs her nothing |
| Coverage indicator | The quality question it hides |
|---|---|
| 89% institutional delivery | Was a skilled provider present at that birth? |
| Facility has a labour room | Is it staffed on every shift? |
| Designated FRU | Is there an anaesthetist at night? |
| Blood bank exists | Was a matched unit available within the hour? |
| Assumption | Why it fails |
|---|---|
| High-risk women can be identified antenatally | Most complications arise in women with no risk factor |
| Risk screening lets us target scarce resources | It misdirects them — and reassures the wrong women |
| Only some births need emergency access | Every birth needs it, because the risk is unpredictable |
| BEmONC | CEmONC | |
|---|---|---|
| Signal functions | Seven | Nine — adds caesarean and transfusion |
| Typical level | PHC | CHC / FRU / district hospital |
| Needs | Drugs, a trained provider | Theatre, anaesthetist, blood bank |
| UN benchmark per 500,000 | At least five facilities | At least one of those five |
| Signal function | Treats |
|---|---|
| Parenteral antibiotics | Sepsis |
| Parenteral uterotonics | Haemorrhage |
| Parenteral anticonvulsants (MgSO₄) | Eclampsia |
| Manual removal of placenta; removal of retained products | Haemorrhage from retained tissue |
| Assisted vaginal delivery; newborn resuscitation | Obstructed second stage; asphyxia |
| Referral step | Failure that kills |
|---|---|
| Recognise and decide | Waiting to see if it settles |
| Stabilise before moving | Sending an eclamptic woman without the first MgSO₄ dose |
| Transport | No vehicle at night; no fuel; no driver |
| Communicate ahead | Arriving unannounced to an unprepared theatre |
| Records travel with her | History reconstructed from scratch on arrival |
| Partograph line | Means | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Progress left of the alert line | Labour progressing normally | Continue observation |
| Crosses the alert line | Slower than expected | Reassess; prepare to refer |
| Crosses the action line | Intervention is overdue | Augment, refer or deliver operatively |
| First minute after birth | Action |
|---|---|
| Baby breathing or crying | Dry, keep warm, skin-to-skin, delay cord clamping |
| Not breathing | Dry, stimulate, clear airway if needed |
| Still not breathing | Bag-and-mask ventilation — within the first minute |
| Element | Single point of failure |
|---|---|
| People | One skilled provider on the roster, on leave |
| Drugs | Oxytocin out of cold chain in summer |
| Blood | Bank exists; no matched unit tonight |
| Theatre | No anaesthetist — the commonest blocker |
| Transport | Ambulance out of fuel, or driver unreachable |
| Why postnatal care is weakest | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Discharge within hours of delivery | She is at home through the highest-risk window |
| Bed pressure in busy labour rooms | Early discharge is an operational necessity |
| No incentive attached to postnatal contact | What is not paid for is not prioritised |
| Deaths at home go uncounted | The failure is invisible in facility data |
| HBNC visit schedule (ASHA) | Days after birth |
|---|---|
| Institutional birth | 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 |
| Home birth | 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 |
| Low birthweight or preterm | Additional visits, closer follow-up |
| AMTSL step | Timing |
|---|---|
| Uterotonic — oxytocin | Within one minute of birth |
| Controlled cord traction | With a contraction, after signs of separation |
| Uterine massage / tone assessment | Immediately and repeatedly after delivery |
| Observation | Continuous through the first hours |
| What the ASHA visit does | Catches |
|---|---|
| Checks the mother’s bleeding, fever, mood | Late PPH, sepsis, postpartum depression |
| Weighs and examines the newborn | Low birthweight, hypothermia, cord infection |
| Watches a feed | Feeding failure — the earliest sign of a sick baby |
| Refers on danger signs | The deaths facility data never sees |
| Newborn danger sign | Suggests |
|---|---|
| Not feeding, unable to suckle | Sepsis — the earliest and most reliable sign |
| Fast or difficult breathing | Pneumonia, respiratory distress |
| Fever, or low body temperature | Sepsis — hypothermia is the more dangerous of the two |
| Lethargy, convulsions, reduced movement | Serious infection or asphyxial injury |
| Redness or discharge at the cord | Omphalitis, a route to sepsis |
| KMC provides | Instead of |
|---|---|
| Continuous skin-to-skin warmth | An incubator that needs power and maintenance |
| Exclusive breastfeeding, frequent feeds | Formula and separation |
| Constant monitoring by the mother | Intermittent monitoring by staff |
| Early discharge with follow-up | A prolonged, expensive admission |
| Practice (NFHS-5) | India |
|---|---|
| Breastfeeding started within one hour | About 42% of births |
| Exclusively breastfed, under six months | About 64% of infants |
| Postnatal contact covers | Because |
|---|---|
| Mother: bleeding, BP, infection, mood | PPH, sepsis and eclampsia can still occur after discharge |
| Newborn: weight, warmth, feeding, danger signs | Most newborn deaths are in the first week |
| Counselling: nutrition, hygiene, birth spacing | The postpartum window is when family planning is most usable |
| Referral for either, immediately | Both deteriorate faster than adults do |
| Mechanism | How it lowers maternal death |
|---|---|
| Fewer unintended pregnancies | Fewer exposures to the risk of pregnancy at all |
| Fewer unsafe abortions | Removes an entire direct cause |
| Better spacing | Avoids the depletion of closely spaced births |
| Avoiding highest-risk ages and parities | Removes the most dangerous pregnancies first |
| Pattern | Added risk |
|---|---|
| Too young — under 18 | Immature pelvis: obstructed labour, fistula, eclampsia |
| Too close — under 24 months apart | Maternal depletion, anaemia, preterm birth |
| Too many — high parity | Cumulative risk; uterine atony and haemorrhage |
| Too old — over 35 | Hypertension, diabetes, chromosomal risk |
| Reason for unmet need | What closes it |
|---|---|
| Method not available at the sub-centre | Supply chain, not counselling |
| Side effects experienced and unexplained | Counselling and follow-up, not a new method |
| Opposition from husband or family | Male engagement; discreet methods |
| Believed not to be at risk while breastfeeding | Accurate postpartum counselling |
| Type | Examples | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Spacing | Condoms, pills, injectables, IUCD | Reversible; user's choice |
| Long-acting | IUCD, implants | Effective for years, reversible |
| Permanent | Female & male sterilisation | For those who want no more children |
| Emergency | Emergency contraceptive pill | After unprotected sex |
| Method type | Typical duration | Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Condoms, pills | Per act / daily | High discontinuation; user-dependent |
| Injectables (Antara) | Three months | Discreet; return of fertility is delayed |
| IUCD, including postpartum insertion | Up to ten years | Reversible; needs a trained inserter and follow-up |
| Sterilisation | Permanent | Requires genuine informed consent |
| Target-driven era | Rights-based approach |
|---|---|
| Numerical method targets for workers | No targets; quality of counselling assessed |
| Sterilisation camps, volume incentives | Fixed-day services with full consent procedures |
| Success measured by acceptors | Success measured by need met and choice honoured |
| Coercion documented in several states | Consent, confidentiality, and the right to refuse |
| Where abortion is | Result |
|---|---|
| Legal, available, and safe | Unsafe abortion effectively disappears as a cause of death |
| Legal but not accessible | Unsafe abortion persists at scale |
| Restricted | Unsafe abortion becomes a leading cause of maternal death |
| MTP Act provision | Position after the 2021 amendment |
|---|---|
| Up to 20 weeks | One registered medical practitioner’s opinion |
| 20–24 weeks | Two practitioners’ opinion, for specified categories of women |
| Beyond 24 weeks | Only for substantial fetal abnormality, via a State Medical Board |
| Confidentiality | Explicit protection; disclosure is an offence |
| Contraceptive failure | Ground extended to any woman, not only married women |
| Barrier after legalisation | What it takes |
|---|---|
| Too few trained, willing providers | Training and certification at district level |
| Providers wrongly fear PCPNDT liability | Clear guidance separating the two laws |
| Stigma; judgement at the facility | Non-judgemental care as a supervised standard |
| Women unaware it is legal | Public information, which almost nowhere exists |
| Determinant | Acts through |
|---|---|
| Poverty | Cost of transport, wages lost, informal payments |
| Gender norms | Who decides, who may travel, whose health counts |
| Caste | Treatment at the facility; where facilities are placed |
| Education | Recognition of danger signs; confidence to demand care |
| Geography | Distance, terrain, season, road |
| Adolescent pregnancy raises | Because |
|---|---|
| Obstructed labour and fistula | The pelvis is not fully grown |
| Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia | Higher incidence in first pregnancies and in young mothers |
| Preterm birth and low birthweight | Maternal undernutrition and immaturity |
| Delay in seeking care | Least power in the household of anyone involved |
| Life stage | What is lost |
|---|---|
| Girl child | Less food, later care than a brother in many households |
| Adolescence | Growth spurt plus menstrual loss, rarely supplemented |
| First pregnancy | Enters already depleted; supplementation starts too late |
| Between births | No recovery interval if spacing is short |
| Cut the data by | Typical finding |
|---|---|
| Wealth quintile | The poorest fifth lags at every stage of the continuum |
| Caste and tribe | Adivasi women furthest from facilities; worse treatment on arrival |
| State | Kerala near 20; the highest-burden states above 150 (SRS 2019–21) |
| District within a state | Often a wider spread than between states |
| Rural / remote | Distance and weak facilities compound all three delays |
| Constraint on the woman | Delay it produces |
|---|---|
| Cannot decide to seek care alone | Delay 1 — the decision waits for someone else |
| No control over household money | Delay 1 and 2 — cannot pay for transport |
| Cannot travel unaccompanied | Delay 2 — departure waits for an escort |
| Her health is not a household priority | All three — the underlying valuation |
| RMC standard | Its violation |
|---|---|
| Dignity and privacy | Examination in view of others; no screens |
| Consent | Episiotomy or fundal pressure without asking |
| Freedom from abuse | Slapping, shouting, humiliation during labour |
| Non-discrimination | Worse treatment by caste, poverty or language |
| Companionship in labour | Family excluded by routine, not by need |
| Consequence of mistreatment | Shows up as |
|---|---|
| She does not return | A home birth next time, counted as a coverage failure |
| She warns others | A whole hamlet’s facility use falls |
| She arrives late | Delay 1 — caused by the facility itself |
| She delivers privately at any cost | Catastrophic health expenditure |
| NHM component | Contribution to maternal health |
|---|---|
| ASHA cadre | The link between household and system |
| Untied funds to facilities | Local purchase when the supply chain fails |
| Rogi Kalyan Samitis | Facility-level management and grievance route |
| Free entitlements (JSSK) | Removes cost at the point of care |
| Quality programmes (LaQshya, SUMAN) | Standards inside the labour room |
| Programme | What it does | Targets |
|---|---|---|
| JSY (2005) | Cash incentive for facility birth | Delays 1 & 2 |
| JSSK (2011) | Free delivery, drugs, transport, blood | Delay 2 & cost |
| PMSMA | Fixed-day free quality antenatal check-ups | ANC stage |
| LaQshya | Labour-room & maternity-OT quality | Delay 3 / quality |
| SUMAN | Assured, free, dignified maternal & newborn care | Whole continuum |
| Scheme | Year | The gap it was created to close |
|---|---|---|
| JSY | 2005 | Women were not coming to facilities |
| JSSK | 2011 | Coming still cost them money |
| PMSMA | 2016 | Antenatal care was attended but not delivered |
| LaQshya | 2017 | Labour rooms were full and not ready |
| SUMAN | 2019 | Care was free but not assured or respectful |
| ASHA does | Paid |
|---|---|
| Registers the pregnancy, follows up ANC | Per activity |
| Accompanies the woman to the facility | Per institutional delivery |
| Makes the HBNC visits | Per completed schedule |
| Counsels on family planning, distributes commodities | Per activity |
| Everything not on the incentive list | Not paid |
| Programme | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| LaQshya | Labour-room and maternity-OT standards, assessed and certified |
| SUMAN | A public assurance of free, dignified care, with a grievance route |
| Maternal Death Surveillance and Response | Every death reviewed, no-blame, findings acted on |
| Kayakalp / NQAS | Facility quality certification, incentive-linked |
| MMR, India (SRS) | Per 100,000 live births |
|---|---|
| 2004–06 | Around 250 |
| 2016–18 | Around 113 |
| 2019–21 | Around 93 |
| What improved fastest | What has not |
|---|---|
| Institutional delivery | Postnatal contact within 48 hours |
| ANC registration | Full ANC with every component delivered |
| The national MMR | The spread between states and districts |
| Access to a facility | Quality and dignity inside it |
| Indicator | What it tells you | Source |
|---|---|---|
| MMR | Deaths per 100,000 live births | SRS |
| Institutional delivery (%) | Where women give birth | NFHS / HMIS |
| 4+ / 8 ANC contacts (%) | Antenatal coverage | NFHS |
| Skilled birth attendance (%) | Who attends the birth | NFHS |
| Maternal death review | Why each death happened | Facility / community MDR |
| Source | Strength | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| SRS | The authoritative MMR | Sampled; lags by years; unstable for small states |
| NFHS | Rich, disaggregated, comparable | Every five years or so; self-reported |
| HMIS | Monthly, facility-level | Counts services, not outcomes; reporting incentives |
| MDSR | Explains why each death happened | Under-reporting where review feels punitive |
| To find | Go to |
|---|---|
| India’s MMR, national and by state | SRS Special Bulletins on Maternal Mortality |
| Coverage and equity, disaggregated | NFHS-5 national, state and district fact sheets |
| What a scheme entitles a woman to | MoHFW guidelines for JSY, JSSK, PMSMA, LaQshya, SUMAN, HBNC |
| Clinical standards | WHO recommendations on antenatal, intrapartum and postnatal care |
| The three-delays framework | Thaddeus & Maine (1994) |