| WHO’s 1946 definition | Criticism it attracts |
|---|---|
| "Complete… well-being" | Nobody is ever completely well — it defines health as unattainable |
| Includes mental and social | Its lasting contribution |
| "Not merely the absence of disease" | The half that changed policy |
| Unchanged since 1946 | Predates chronic disease and ageing as the main burden |
| "Organised efforts of society" means | Not |
|---|---|
| Law and regulation | Advice to individuals |
| Infrastructure — water, sanitation, roads | A clinic |
| Collective financing | Personal responsibility |
| Surveillance and response | Waiting for people to present |
| Clinical / curative care | Public health | |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | The individual patient | The population |
| Timing | After illness appears | Before illness appears (mostly) |
| Focus | Diagnosis & treatment | Prevention & promotion |
| Setting | Hospital, clinic | Community, policy, environment |
| Measure of success | Patient recovers | Fewer people fall ill |
| Clinical care | Public health | |
|---|---|---|
| Success looks like | This patient recovers | Fewer people fall ill |
| Visible? | Yes — a grateful patient | No — nothing happens |
| Funding follows | Visible need | Political will |
| Attribution | Clear | Almost impossible |
| Cliff parable | Real equivalent |
|---|---|
| Ambulance at the bottom | Emergency and curative care |
| Fence at the top | Prevention and regulation |
| Asking why people fall | Epidemiology |
| Asking who built the path there | Social determinants |
| Downstream | Upstream | Cost per case averted |
|---|---|---|
| Treat the diarrhoea case | Piped water and sanitation | Far lower upstream |
| Prescribe ORS | Rotavirus vaccination | Lower upstream |
| Rehydrate the child | Handwashing promotion | Lower upstream |
| Treat pneumonia | Clean cooking fuel | Lower upstream |
| Core function | In practice | Weak when |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment | Surveillance, outbreak detection | Data collected and unread |
| Policy development | Laws, plans, standards | No enforcement capacity |
| Assurance | Services, workforce, access | Posts sanctioned, unfilled |
| Promotion | Information, community action | Reduced to poster campaigns |
| Intervention | Why it is a "best buy" |
|---|---|
| Childhood immunisation | Very low cost per DALY averted; lifelong protection |
| Water and sanitation | Prevents diarrhoea, worms and stunting together |
| Tobacco taxation | Raises revenue while cutting consumption |
| Salt reduction in the food supply | Population-wide, needs no individual behaviour change |
| Determinant | Acts on health through |
|---|---|
| Income | Food, housing, care-seeking, stress |
| Education | Health literacy, income, agency |
| Housing and water | Infection exposure directly |
| Work | Injury risk, exposure, income, control |
| Social position | Chronic stress and access, at every level |
| Rainbow layer | Policy lever |
|---|---|
| Individual lifestyle | Education, taxation, defaults |
| Living and working conditions | Housing, water, work |
| Socio-economic conditions | Macroeconomic and fiscal policy |
| Two children, same city | Differ by |
|---|---|
| Water supply | Piped versus shared standpipe |
| Sanitation | Household toilet versus open defecation |
| Cooking fuel | LPG versus biomass |
| School | Completion versus dropout |
| Life expectancy | Sometimes by many years |
| Whitehall findings | What they overturned |
|---|---|
| Health worsens at every step down the ladder | "Poverty causes ill health" as the whole story |
| Senior civil servants outlive junior ones | The idea that only absolute deprivation matters |
| Control at work predicts heart disease | Stress as an executive problem |
| The gradient persists with healthcare access equal | Access alone explaining the gap |
| Difference in health | Inequality or inequity? |
|---|---|
| Older people are frailer | Inequality — not unjust |
| Men and women differ in some conditions | Inequality, largely biological |
| Dalit children more stunted | Inequity — avoidable and unfair |
| Rural areas have fewer doctors | Inequity — a policy choice |
| Determinant | Why it matters here |
|---|---|
| Sanitation | Open defecation drives diarrhoea, worms and stunting |
| Clean cooking fuel | Biomass smoke fuels respiratory disease in women |
| Caste & tribe | Dalit & Adivasi communities face worse outcomes |
| Gender | Son preference, anaemia, unpaid care work, mobility |
| Air quality | Among the world's most polluted air in many cities |
| Income & informality | Most workers lack sick pay or health cover |
| Determinant | Mechanism | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Sanitation | Diarrhoea, worms, stunting | Toilets used, not only built |
| Clean cooking fuel | Respiratory disease in women and children | LPG access and affordability |
| Caste | Access and treatment on arrival | Enforcement; facility accountability |
| Air quality | Cardiovascular and respiratory disease | Emission standards |
| Undernutrition | Susceptibility to everything | Food, WASH, women’s status |
| Level | Question | Who acts |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome | The child has diarrhoea | A clinician |
| Cause | Contaminated water | Water supply |
| Cause of the cause | No piped supply or toilet | Local government, budget |
| Root | Poverty, exclusion, weak governance | Politics |
| Sector | Health effect |
|---|---|
| Roads and transport | Injuries; air quality; physical activity |
| Water and sanitation | Diarrhoea, stunting, worms |
| Education, especially girls’ | Child survival, nutrition, fertility |
| Food and agriculture | Diet quality; the whole NCD trajectory |
| Housing | Respiratory disease; heat; injury |
| Epidemiology asks | Producing |
|---|---|
| How much disease, and where? | Descriptive epidemiology |
| In whom? | Risk-group identification |
| Why? | Analytic epidemiology |
| What works? | Intervention studies |
| Is it working now? | Surveillance and evaluation |
| Incidence | Prevalence | |
|---|---|---|
| Counts | New cases in a period | All existing cases now |
| Measures | Risk of getting it | Burden on the system |
| Rises when | Transmission increases | People live longer with it |
| Falls when | Prevention works | People recover or die |
| Question | Measure |
|---|---|
| How fast is TB spreading? | Incidence |
| How many people need treatment now? | Prevalence |
| Is the programme preventing new cases? | Incidence |
| How many beds and drugs do we need? | Prevalence |
| Term | What it is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion | Part out of a whole (the part is in the whole) | % of children fully immunised |
| Ratio | One quantity relative to another | Sex ratio: females per 1,000 males |
| Rate | Events per population per unit time | Deaths per 1,000 per year |
| Term | Numerator is | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion | Part of the denominator | % of children immunised |
| Ratio | Not part of it | Sex ratio: females per 1,000 males |
| Rate | Events, over time | TB cases per 100,000 per year |
| Triad element | Intervention | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | Kill or neutralise it | Chlorination; antibiotics |
| Host | Make them resistant | Vaccination; nutrition |
| Environment | Change the conditions | Sanitation; drainage; nets |
| Step | What goes wrong |
|---|---|
| Confirm the outbreak | Better detection mistaken for a real rise |
| Define a case | A loose definition swamps you with non-cases |
| Describe by person, place, time | The epidemic curve is skipped |
| Test a hypothesis | The first plausible source is accepted |
| Control and communicate | Silence, so rumour fills the gap |
| Disease | Approximate R₀ | Herd immunity threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Measles | Very high — among the highest known | Around 95% |
| Diphtheria, rubella | High | Around 85% |
| Polio | Moderate to high | Around 80–85% |
| Seasonal influenza | Low | Much lower |
| Design | What it does | Strength |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | Snapshot of a population | Fast, gives prevalence |
| Case-control | Compare sick vs well, look back | Good for rare disease |
| Cohort | Follow exposed vs unexposed forward | Gives incidence & risk |
| Randomised trial | Randomly assign the intervention | Strongest for causation |
| Design | Gives | Main weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-sectional | Prevalence, fast | Cannot establish time order |
| Case-control | Odds ratios; good for rare disease | Recall and selection bias |
| Cohort | Incidence and relative risk | Slow, expensive, attrition |
| Trial | Causal effect | Cost; sometimes unethical |
| Vital statistic | Source in India | Known gap |
|---|---|---|
| Births and deaths | Civil Registration System | Registration is uneven |
| Mortality rates | Sample Registration System | Lags by years; sampled |
| Cause of death | Medical certification; verbal autopsy | Most deaths are uncertified |
| Morbidity | NFHS, NSS, HMIS | Self-reported; facility-biased |
| Indicator | Meaning | Per |
|---|---|---|
| IMR | Infant deaths under 1 year | per 1,000 live births |
| U5MR | Deaths under 5 years | per 1,000 live births |
| NMR | Neonatal deaths (first 28 days) | per 1,000 live births |
| MMR | Maternal deaths | per 100,000 live births |
| CDR | Crude death rate (all ages) | per 1,000 population |
| Indicator | India, roughly (SRS) | Signals |
|---|---|---|
| IMR | Around 27 per 1,000 live births | Overall child survival |
| U5MR | Around 31 per 1,000 | Includes post-infant deaths |
| NMR | Around 20 per 1,000 | Now most of infant mortality |
| MMR | Around 93 per 100,000 | Health system reach and quality |
| Measure | Captures | Misses |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | Who dies and when | Everyone living with illness |
| Morbidity | Illness and disability | How bad each condition is |
| DALYs | Death and disability combined | Wellbeing beyond health |
| Condition | High mortality? | High disability burden? |
|---|---|---|
| Ischaemic heart disease | Yes | Moderate |
| Depression | No | Very high |
| Road injury | Yes | High — and in the young |
| Back and neck pain | No | Very high |
| Neonatal conditions | Yes | Very high — many years lost |
| DALY component | Measures | Driven by |
|---|---|---|
| YLL | Years lost to early death | Age at death against reference life expectancy |
| YLD | Years lived with disability | Duration × disability weight |
| DALY | Total healthy years lost | Both |
| India’s system | Collects | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| IDSP / IHIP | Outbreak signals from facilities | Depends on reporting discipline |
| HMIS | Facility service delivery data | Counts services, not outcomes |
| SRS | Births and deaths, sampled | Lags by years |
| CRS | Civil registration | Cause-of-death data is incomplete |
| Link in the chain | Break it by |
|---|---|
| Agent | Treatment; disinfection |
| Reservoir | Animal control; treating carriers |
| Portal of exit | Covering coughs; safe disposal |
| Transmission | Sanitation, vectors, ventilation, distance |
| Susceptible host | Vaccination; nutrition |
| Route | Example diseases | Key barrier |
|---|---|---|
| Airborne / droplet | TB, measles, COVID-19 | Ventilation, masks, vaccines |
| Faecal–oral | Cholera, typhoid, polio | Safe water, sanitation |
| Vector-borne | Malaria, dengue, kala-azar | Nets, spraying, source control |
| Blood / sexual | HIV, hepatitis B | Safe blood, condoms, PrEP |
| Contact | Scabies, trachoma | Hygiene, treatment |
| Route | Break it by | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|
| Airborne / droplet | Ventilation, masks, vaccines | Crowded, unventilated indoor spaces |
| Faecal–oral | Safe water, sanitation, handwashing | Toilets built and unused |
| Vector-borne | Nets, spraying, source reduction | Standing water nobody owns |
| Bloodborne | Safe injections, screened blood | Reused equipment |
| Vaccine type | How it works | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Live attenuated | Weakened pathogen | Strong, lasting immunity; cold chain critical |
| Inactivated | Killed pathogen | Safer in immunocompromised; often needs boosters |
| Subunit / conjugate | A piece of the pathogen | Very safe; multiple doses |
| mRNA | Instructions to make a piece | Rapid to develop and manufacture |
| Herd immunity | Requires |
|---|---|
| Threshold rises with R₀ | Measles needs about 95%, others less |
| Coverage measured locally | A national average can hide unprotected pockets |
| Sustained coverage | It is not achieved once and kept |
| A vaccine that blocks transmission | Not all do — some only prevent severe disease |
| India’s UIP | Detail |
|---|---|
| Scale | One of the largest immunisation programmes in the world |
| Vaccines | Free, against a dozen-plus diseases |
| Mission Indradhanush | Targets districts and children the routine programme misses |
| Achievement | Polio-free since 2014; maternal and neonatal tetanus eliminated |
| Remaining challenge | The last mile — clustered unvaccinated children |
| Disease | Burden note | India's response |
|---|---|---|
| Tuberculosis | India carries a large share of global TB | NTEP; free diagnosis & treatment; elimination goal |
| HIV/AIDS | Concentrated epidemic in key populations | NACO; free ART; targeted prevention |
| Malaria | Falling, but endemic pockets remain | NVBDCP; nets, spraying, prompt treatment |
| Disease | India’s programme | Central challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Tuberculosis | NTEP — free diagnosis and treatment | Private-sector cases going unnotified |
| HIV | NACO — free ART, targeted prevention | Stigma and reaching key populations |
| Malaria | NVBDCP — elimination framework | Residual transmission in forested districts |
| AMR driver | Response |
|---|---|
| Antibiotics sold without prescription | Enforcement of scheduling rules |
| Prescribing for viral illness | Clinician training; patient expectation |
| Incomplete courses | Support to completion, not just supply |
| Routine use in animal farming | Regulation of non-therapeutic use |
| Weak infection control in hospitals | Hygiene, isolation, surveillance |
| Stage | Main burden | Where South Asia sits |
|---|---|---|
| Pestilence and famine | Infection, child death | Largely past |
| Receding pandemics | Falling infection, rising NCDs | Recently passed |
| Degenerative disease | NCDs dominate | Arriving now |
| Double burden | Both at once | The actual position |
| Nutrition transition | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Processed food becomes cheaper than fresh | Diet quality falls as incomes rise |
| Salt, sugar and trans-fat in the food supply | Individual choice cannot avoid it |
| Physical activity falls | Mechanised work and transport |
| Undernutrition persists alongside | The double burden, in one household |
| NCD | Note for South Asia |
|---|---|
| Cardiovascular disease | The leading cause of death; strikes at younger ages here |
| Diabetes | India has one of the world's largest diabetic populations |
| Cancer | Tobacco-linked oral cancer is especially common |
| Chronic respiratory disease | Driven by air pollution & biomass smoke |
| NCD | South Asian particularity |
|---|---|
| Cardiovascular disease | Leading killer; strikes roughly a decade earlier than in Europe |
| Diabetes | Onset at lower BMI; very large affected population |
| Cancer | Tobacco-linked oral cancer unusually prominent |
| Chronic respiratory disease | Driven by household and ambient air pollution |
| Risk factor | Population-level lever |
|---|---|
| Tobacco, including smokeless | Tax, plain packaging, smoke-free spaces |
| Salt, sugar, trans-fat | Reformulation, labelling, trans-fat limits |
| Physical inactivity | Walkable streets, public transport |
| Harmful alcohol | Tax, availability, advertising limits |
| Air pollution | Emission standards, clean cooking fuel |
| Mental health in South Asia | Position |
|---|---|
| Share of disease burden | Large, and systematically under-counted |
| Share of health spending | A very small fraction |
| Treatment gap | Most people with a common disorder receive no treatment |
| Specialist workforce | Far below need |
| Legal framework in India | Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 — rights-based |
| Injury type | Who | Proven intervention |
|---|---|---|
| Road traffic | Young men disproportionately | Helmets, speed limits, road design |
| Drowning | Young children | Barriers, supervision, swimming skills |
| Burns | Women cooking on open flame | Clean fuel, safer stoves |
| Self-harm | Young adults; farmers | Means restriction — pesticide regulation |
| WHO best buy | Why it qualifies |
|---|---|
| Tobacco and alcohol taxation | Raises revenue while cutting harm |
| Advertising bans, plain packaging | Low cost; no individual action needed |
| Salt reduction; trans-fat elimination | Population-wide by regulation |
| Hypertension treatment in primary care | Cheap drugs, large mortality benefit |
| HPV vaccination and cervical screening | Prevents a major cancer |
| Continuum stage | Where women fall out |
|---|---|
| Adolescence and pre-pregnancy | Anaemia never addressed before conception |
| Pregnancy | Visits attended; components not delivered |
| Childbirth | Largely closed in India — about 89% institutional |
| Postnatal | Discharged within hours; no contact in the fatal window |
| Childhood | Immunisation completed, growth monitoring not acted on |
| Delay | Located in | Fixed by |
|---|---|---|
| Deciding to seek care | The household | ASHA outreach, danger signs, cash |
| Reaching a facility | The road | Referral transport, free entitlements |
| Receiving adequate care | The facility | Staff, drugs, blood, a working theatre |
| Intervention | Prevents | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Oxytocin at delivery | Postpartum haemorrhage | A few rupees |
| Magnesium sulphate | Eclampsia | Cheap; no refrigeration |
| Skilled attendance | The labour-window deaths | Staffing |
| Emergency obstetric care within reach | Obstructed labour, haemorrhage | Theatre, blood, anaesthetist |
| Postnatal contact within 48 hours | Late PPH, sepsis | Outreach time |
| Newborn intervention | Prevents |
|---|---|
| Kangaroo mother care | Hypothermia and death in low-birthweight babies |
| Bag-and-mask resuscitation | Birth asphyxia deaths — in the first minute |
| Early and exclusive breastfeeding | Infection and undernutrition |
| Clean cord care | Sepsis and neonatal tetanus |
| Home visits in the first week | Deaths after early discharge |
| Indicator | What it measures | Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Stunting | Low height-for-age | Chronic, long-term undernutrition |
| Wasting | Low weight-for-height | Acute, recent malnutrition (dangerous) |
| Underweight | Low weight-for-age | A mix of both |
| Anaemia | Low haemoglobin | Iron deficiency; very common here |
| Indicator | Measures | India (NFHS-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Stunting | Chronic undernutrition | About 36% of under-fives |
| Wasting | Acute — the dangerous one | About 19% |
| Underweight | A mix of both | About 32% |
| Anaemia in children | Micronutrient deficiency | About 67% |
| Window | What determines the outcome |
|---|---|
| Pregnancy | Maternal nutrition, anaemia, weight gain |
| 0–6 months | Exclusive breastfeeding |
| 6–24 months | Complementary feeding quality; infection |
| After 24 months | Stunting is largely irreversible |
| ICDS / POSHAN service | Known weakness |
|---|---|
| Supplementary nutrition | Take-home ration diverted or diluted |
| Growth monitoring | Weighing done; counselling skipped |
| Pre-school education | Squeezed by the feeding workload |
| Immunisation and referral | Depends on ANM visit reliability |
| Counselling for mothers | The highest-value component, least delivered |
| Nutrition input | Works through |
|---|---|
| Food | Direct intake |
| Sanitation | Prevents the infections that drain nutrients |
| Clean water | Same |
| Breastfeeding | Nutrition plus immunity |
| Women’s education and agency | Feeding practice, care-seeking, birth spacing |
| A health system includes | Commonly forgotten |
|---|---|
| Hospitals and clinics | No |
| Financing and pooling | Yes |
| Supply chains for drugs | Yes — until a stockout |
| Information systems | Yes |
| Governance and regulation | Yes — especially of the private sector |
| Building block | Fails as |
|---|---|
| Service delivery | Facilities that exist and cannot function |
| Health workforce | Sanctioned posts, unfilled |
| Information | Data collected and unused |
| Medical products | Stockouts |
| Financing | Out-of-pocket payment |
| Governance | An unregulated private sector |
| Workforce issue | In South Asia |
|---|---|
| Density per population | Below WHO benchmarks in much of the region |
| Distribution | Concentrated in cities; rural posts vacant |
| Skill mix | Doctor-heavy planning; nurses and midwives undervalued |
| Retention | Rural postings treated as time to be served |
| Community cadre | ASHAs carry the load and are not salaried |
| Mechanism | How it works | Equity |
|---|---|---|
| Out-of-pocket | Patient pays at the point of care | Worst — sickness = debt |
| Tax-funded | Government funds from general taxes | Strong if well funded |
| Insurance | Pooled premiums (social or private) | Good if it covers the poor |
| Financing mechanism | Equity | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Out-of-pocket | Worst — the sick pay most | Catastrophic expenditure; impoverishment |
| Tax-funded | Strong, if adequately funded | Depends on fiscal space and political will |
| Social insurance | Good for the covered | Excludes informal workers |
| Private insurance | Poor | Selects the healthy; excludes the sick |
| UHC requires | Without it |
|---|---|
| Services people actually need | Coverage of the wrong things |
| Adequate quality | Contact without benefit |
| No financial hardship | Care that impoverishes |
| For everyone | A scheme, not universal coverage |
| UHC dimension | Extending it means |
|---|---|
| Population | Covering people currently excluded |
| Services | Adding what is not in the package |
| Cost | Reducing what patients pay directly |
| Alma-Ata principle | What happened to it |
|---|---|
| Essential care, close to home | Survived |
| Community participation | Weakened into consultation |
| Intersectoral action | Largely abandoned |
| Appropriate technology | Survived |
| Health for All by 2000 | Not achieved |
| Alma-Ata, 1978 | Astana, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Central claim | PHC is the route to Health for All | PHC is the route to UHC |
| Context | Infectious disease, child survival | NCDs, ageing, technology |
| Community role | Participation | Empowered communities |
| What followed | Selective PHC — a narrowing | Implementation still uneven |
| Feature of India’s system | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Health is mainly a state subject | Enormous variation between states |
| Centre sets policy and co-funds | Leverage without direct delivery |
| A large private sector | Most outpatient care is private and lightly regulated |
| Mixed financing | High out-of-pocket share |
| Tier | Facility | Roughly serves |
|---|---|---|
| First contact | Sub-Centre (SC) / HWC | ~3,000–5,000 people |
| Primary | Primary Health Centre (PHC) | ~20,000–30,000 people |
| First referral | Community Health Centre (CHC) | ~80,000–120,000 people |
| Higher | District hospital & above | The district |
| Tier | Norm population | Typical gap |
|---|---|---|
| Sub-Centre / HWC | About 3,000–5,000 | ANM vacancies; supply irregularity |
| PHC | About 20,000–30,000 | Medical officer posts unfilled |
| CHC / FRU | About 80,000–120,000 | Specialist posts — the largest shortfall |
| District hospital | District | Overcrowded by referrals from below |
| NHM contribution | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| The ASHA cadre | A community link that did not previously exist |
| Untied funds to facilities | Local purchase when procurement fails |
| Rogi Kalyan Samitis | Facility-level management and grievance route |
| Free entitlements | Removes cost at the point of care |
| Flexible state funding | Lets states adapt to their own burden |
| ASHA | Position |
|---|---|
| Status | Volunteer, not salaried staff |
| Payment | Performance-based incentives per task |
| Number | Close to a million across India |
| Role | The link between household and health system |
| Recognition | WHO Global Health Leaders Award, 2022 |
| Ayushman Bharat, 2018 | Covers | Does not cover |
|---|---|---|
| Health & Wellness Centres | Comprehensive primary care, NCD screening | Depends on staffing reaching the norm |
| PM-JAY | Secondary and tertiary hospitalisation | Outpatient care and medicines |
| Ayushman Bharat pillar | Addresses | Gap |
|---|---|---|
| Health & Wellness Centres | Comprehensive primary care | Staffing and supply at scale |
| PM-JAY | Catastrophic hospital costs | Covers hospitalisation, not outpatient care |
| Together | Prevention plus financial protection | Outpatient spending is most of out-of-pocket cost |
| India’s health financing | Position |
|---|---|
| Government spending | Long around 1–2% of GDP |
| National Health Policy 2017 target | Toward 2.5% of GDP |
| Out-of-pocket share | Falling, still high by international standards |
| Consequence | Millions pushed into poverty by health costs each year |
| The inverse care law operates through | Example |
|---|---|
| Where facilities are located | Doctors concentrate in cities |
| Who can reach them | Distance, cost, time off work |
| How people are treated on arrival | Discrimination by caste, language, poverty |
| What is available when they get there | Stockouts in poorer districts |
| Group | Barrier | Where it operates |
|---|---|---|
| Dalit and Adivasi communities | Distance and discrimination | Access and treatment |
| Women | Permission, mobility, low priority | Care-seeking |
| Remote and hill districts | Distance, staffing | Availability |
| Urban slums | Counted nowhere; no facility mapped | Everything |
| Persons with disabilities | Physical access; assumptions | Availability and acceptability |
| IHR (2005) requires countries to | COVID exposed |
|---|---|
| Detect events | Uneven surveillance capacity |
| Report within set timeframes | Incentives to delay |
| Maintain core capacities | Widespread shortfalls |
| Avoid unnecessary trade and travel restrictions | Routinely ignored |
| One Health domain | Contribution |
|---|---|
| Human health | Detection, treatment, vaccination |
| Animal health | Where most emerging pathogens originate |
| Environment | Land-use change and habitat loss drive spillover |
| Together | The only level at which spillover can be reduced |
| Climate pathway | Health effect | Who is hit first |
|---|---|---|
| Heat | Heatstroke, kidney disease, mortality | Outdoor workers, the elderly |
| Vector range shifts | Dengue and malaria in new areas | Newly exposed populations |
| Extreme weather | Injury, displacement, water contamination | Coastal and riverine communities |
| Crop failure | Undernutrition | The poorest |
| Climate action | Health co-benefit | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Clean cooking fuel | Less respiratory disease in women and children | Immediate |
| Reduced vehicle emissions | Less asthma, cardiovascular disease | Immediate |
| Active transport | Physical activity, fewer NCDs | Immediate |
| Greener cities | Heat mitigation, mental health | Medium term |
| Global health achievement | What made it possible |
|---|---|
| Smallpox eradication, 1980 | Surveillance-containment, global cooperation |
| Polio, close to eradication | Sustained campaigns; still fragile |
| ART access expansion | Price negotiation and generic manufacture |
| Vaccine access via Gavi | Pooled procurement |
| Prevention level | Reach | Cost per person protected |
|---|---|---|
| Primordial | Everyone | Lowest |
| Primary | Everyone at risk | Low |
| Secondary, then tertiary | Those screened, then the ill | Highest |
| Level | Acts on | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Primordial | Risk factors before they arise | Clean air policy; healthy food environment |
| Primary | Stop disease before it starts | Immunisation, sanitation, tobacco tax |
| Secondary | Catch disease early | Screening for BP, diabetes, cervical cancer |
| Tertiary | Limit harm once disease exists | Rehabilitation, managing complications |
| Level | Acts on | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Primordial | Risk factors before they arise | Clean air policy; healthy food environment |
| Primary | Disease before onset | Immunisation, sanitation, tobacco tax |
| Secondary | Early disease | Screening; hypertension detection |
| Tertiary | Established disease | Rehabilitation; complication prevention |
| High-risk strategy | Population strategy | |
|---|---|---|
| Targets | The few at greatest risk | The whole distribution |
| Benefit per person | Large | Small |
| Total cases prevented | Fewer | More |
| Requires | Screening and individual treatment | Policy and regulation |
| The paradox | — | Large benefit to the population, little to each individual |
| Health promotion is | It is not |
|---|---|
| Enabling people to control their health | Telling them what to do |
| Healthy public policy | A poster campaign |
| Supportive environments | Individual exhortation |
| Community action | Messaging delivered to communities |
| Reorienting health services | An add-on to clinical care |
| Communication principle | Failure it prevents |
|---|---|
| Make the healthy choice the easy choice | Advice that only the already-able can follow |
| Use trusted local messengers | A correct message from a distrusted source |
| Be honest about uncertainty | Credibility lost when guidance changes |
| Fill the vacuum early | Rumour arriving first |
| Address stigma directly | People avoiding services entirely |
| Source | Best for |
|---|---|
| Marmot, The Status Syndrome | The social gradient, argued from the evidence |
| Drèze & Sen, An Uncertain Glory | India’s health and development record |
| WHO fact sheets and reports | Current guidance and definitions |
| NFHS and SRS (India) | Your own state and district numbers |
| Global Burden of Disease | Cause and risk-factor rankings |