ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
ImpactMojo 101 Series · Free Forever

Water,
Sanitation
& Hygiene 101

The JMP service ladders, India's numbers and how they disagree, Swachh Bharat, Jal Jeevan, groundwater, sanitation work and the law, hygiene, and how to monitor a WASH programme
Course Notes PDF · ₹149100 SlidesSouth Asia FocusCourse free foreverPublic Health
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What we cover
01
Why WASH matters and what it covers
Slides 3–10
02
The JMP service ladders
Slides 11–18
03
India's numbers from the JMP, NFHS and NSS
Slides 19–27
04
What Swachh Bharat Mission built
Slides 28–35
05
ODF claims and the survey evidence
Slides 36–44
06
Jal Jeevan Mission, from taps to working water
Slides 45–53
07
Groundwater depletion and contamination
Slides 54–61
08
Who governs water and sanitation
Slides 62–68
09
Faecal sludge, sanitation work and the 2013 Act
Slides 69–77
10
Handwashing and menstrual health
Slides 78–86
11
Climate, drought and water security
Slides 87–92
12
Monitoring a WASH programme
Slides 93–99
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
01
Section One
Why WASH matters and what it covers
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Three services that block one route of infection
WASH stands for water, sanitation and hygiene. Water means drinking water that is close, available when it is needed and free of contamination. Sanitation means a toilet that separates excreta from human contact and a chain of services that keeps it separated until it is treated or safely buried. Hygiene means the practices that keep hands, food and water clean, above all washing hands with soap, and the facilities that make those practices possible, including for menstruation.
Why the three are taught together
Diarrhoea, worm infections and many enteric infections travel the same way, from one person's faeces to another person's mouth. Each service blocks a different stretch of that route. A toilet keeps faeces out of the environment, safe water keeps them out of the drink, and soap keeps them off the hands that prepare food and feed children.
Why they are run separately
In India the three sit in different programmes. Drinking water is Jal Jeevan Mission, rural sanitation is Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen), urban sanitation is Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban), and hygiene is scattered across health, education and both missions. A district officer sees three dashboards for one route of infection.
This course follows the route of infection first and the programmes second, because a child is exposed through whichever barrier is weakest.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Unsafe WASH still kills on the scale of a major disease
1.4 million
deaths in 2019 that safe WASH could have prevented, worldwide
Wolf et al., Lancet, 2023
74 million
disability-adjusted life-years lost in the same year
Wolf et al., Lancet, 2023
2.5%
of all deaths worldwide in 2019 attributable to unsafe WASH
Wolf et al., Lancet, 2023
Share of each outcome attributable to unsafe WASH, world, 2019 (%)
Wolf et al., Lancet, 2023, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00458-0
The estimate uses the SDG service ladders as the yardstick, so a household counts as exposed until it reaches safely managed water and sanitation and basic hygiene. Soil-transmitted helminth infection is attributed wholly to unsafe WASH. Treat the figures as a model of what full coverage could avert, and note the authors' own counterfactual is the SDG target.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The F-diagram shows how faeces reach a mouth
01
Faeces
→
02
Fluids
→
03
Fingers
→
04
Flies
→
05
Fields
→
06
Food
→
07
New host
Public health teaching draws transmission as the F-diagram. Pathogens leave an infected person in faeces and reach the next person through water, hands, flies, soil and the food that all of these touch. Barriers work at two points. Primary barriers stop faeces entering the environment at all. They include a toilet that is used, safe disposal of children's faeces and safe emptying of pits and tanks. Secondary barriers stop contamination already in the environment from reaching the mouth. They include handwashing, safe water storage and treatment, and food hygiene.
Primary barriers
A latrine that every member uses, safe disposal of small children's faeces, and a pit or tank that is emptied and treated without exposing workers or neighbours.
Secondary barriers
Handwashing with soap after defecation, after cleaning a child and before food. Covered storage and household treatment. The NSS 76th round found 65.3% of households did not treat drinking water, 72.8% in rural areas (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Statement 8).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Sanitation protects the neighbours as much as the owner
A household that builds and uses a toilet lowers the exposure of every child nearby. A household that defecates in the open raises it, whatever the neighbours do. That spillover is why sanitation behaves like a public good and why health gains depend on how many people in a village stop open defecation, as well as on whether any single family has a latrine.
The district evidence
Spears, Ghosh and Cumming matched HUNGaMA 2011 stunting data from 112 districts with Census 2011 open defecation. After adjusting for wealth, maternal education and calorie availability, a 10 percentage point rise in open defecation was associated with a 0.7 point rise in stunting (PLoS ONE, 2013). The design is ecological, and the authors say so.
What that means for a programme
A target of a toilet in each house measures construction. A target that matters for health counts the share of people in a settlement who use one, and how faeces are handled afterwards. Section 5 shows how far those two kinds of number have drifted apart in India.
Coverage thresholds matter. A village at 60% use can still have enough faeces in its lanes and ponds to keep children sick.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Access, use, safety and function are separate numbers
MeasurementQuestion it answersTypical source in IndiaWhat it misses
AccessDoes the household have a toilet or a water source?Census, NSS, NFHS, SBM and JJM recordsWhether anyone uses it
UseDoes each member use it every time?Individual questions in NSS 76 and r.i.c.e. surveysSelf-report bias, children's faeces
SafetyIs the water clean, is excreta contained and treated?Lab tests, JMP safely managed rungsRarely measured at household level
FunctionDoes the tap give enough water every day?JJM Functionality AssessmentSeasonal failure between survey rounds
Most public claims about WASH in India are claims about access, because access is what a construction programme can count. Use, safety and function are harder to measure and they are the measurements that decide whether children get sick. When a report gives one number, ask which of the four it is.
Throughout the deck each figure is labelled with the measurement it represents and the survey or record it comes from.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Water collection, distance and caste shape who goes without
Distance and drudgery
In 2018, 58.2% of rural households and 80.7% of urban households had drinking water within their premises (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019). Someone in the other households walks to fetch it, and that person is usually a woman or a girl. In the JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, 79% of households where women used to fetch water reported less drudgery after a tap was installed (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Caste and class
The same NSS round found 71.3% of rural households had access to a latrine, against 62.8% of Scheduled Caste and 63.3% of Scheduled Tribe rural households. Across rural consumption quintiles access rose from 53.5% in the poorest fifth to 86.7% in the richest (NSS 76th round, via MoSPI eSankhyiki).
58.2%
rural households with drinking water within premises, 2018
NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019
62.8%
rural SC households with latrine access, 2018
NSS 76th round, via MoSPI eSankhyiki
79%
of formerly water-fetching households report less drudgery with a tap
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How the twelve sections fit together
01
Ladders
→
02
India's numbers
→
03
Swachh Bharat
→
04
ODF evidence
→
05
Jal Jeevan
→
06
Groundwater
→
07
Governance
→
08
Sludge and workers
→
09
Hygiene
→
10
Climate
→
11
Monitoring
What you will be able to do
Read a JMP ladder and explain each rung. Reconcile a government ODF claim with NSS, NFHS and independent survey figures. Read a JJM dashboard number alongside the functionality assessment. Look up your block's groundwater category and contamination record. Explain the 2013 Act on manual scavenging and what NAMASTE does. Design a monitoring plan that measures use and function as well as construction.
Who this is for
Programme staff in NGOs and CSR teams, district and block officials, evaluators, journalists and students who meet WASH numbers and need to know what sits behind them. No engineering background is assumed. For a reading list on behaviour and toilet use, see the ImpactMojo Deep Dive Water, Sanitation, and the Behaviour Gap.
Figures are current to October 2026. Survey rounds named on each slide tell you how old the underlying data are.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
02
Section Two
The JMP service ladders
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Targets 6.1 and 6.2 and how the JMP measures them
The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) is the custodian of the global indicators for SDG targets 6.1 (drinking water) and 6.2 (sanitation and hygiene). It publishes an estimate for every country from national surveys, censuses and administrative records, using one set of definitions so that countries and years can be compared.
Safely managed drinking water
Drinking water from an improved water source that is accessible on premises, available when needed and free from faecal and priority chemical contamination (JMP).
Safely managed sanitation
Use of improved facilities that are not shared with other households and where excreta are safely disposed of in situ or removed and treated off-site (JMP).
Basic hygiene
Availability of a handwashing facility with soap and water at home (JMP).
Each definition stacks conditions. A household fails the top rung if any one condition fails, which is why safely managed figures fall well below access figures.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Five rungs from surface water to safely managed
RungJMP definition
Safely managedImproved source, accessible on premises, available when needed, free from faecal and priority chemical contamination
BasicImproved source, collection time not more than 30 minutes for a round trip, including queuing
LimitedImproved source for which collection time exceeds 30 minutes for a round trip, including queuing
UnimprovedUnprotected dug well or unprotected spring
Surface waterDirectly from a river, dam, lake, pond, stream, canal or irrigation canal
What counts as improved
These are sources that by design can deliver safe water, such as piped water, boreholes and tubewells, protected dug wells and springs, rainwater and packaged or delivered water. The NFHS-6 footnote lists piped water, public taps, tubewells, protected wells and springs, rainwater, tanker trucks, carts with small tanks, bottled water and community RO plants (NFHS-6 India fact sheet (provisional), IIPS, May 2026).
The 30-minute line
Time is measured as a round trip including the queue. A protected well an hour away is improved and still only a limited service. Surveys ask the time, so the line depends on the respondent's estimate.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Five rungs from open defecation to safely managed
RungJMP definition
Safely managedImproved facility, not shared, excreta safely disposed of in situ or removed and treated off-site
BasicImproved facility not shared with other households
LimitedImproved facility shared with other households
UnimprovedPit latrine without a slab or platform, hanging latrine or bucket latrine
Open defecationDisposal of human faeces in fields, forests, bushes, open bodies of water, beaches or other open places, or with solid waste
Improved facilities
Flush or pour-flush to a sewer, septic tank or pit, ventilated improved pit latrines, pit latrines with a slab and composting toilets. These are designs that separate excreta from human contact.
Where India's counting is weakest
The top rung depends on what happens after the pit or tank fills. For India the JMP records no data on sludge that is emptied and treated, and its country file states there are insufficient data to estimate safely managed sanitation at national level (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Hygiene is measured by looking at the handwashing place
RungJMP definition
BasicAvailability of a handwashing facility with soap and water at home
LimitedAvailability of a handwashing facility lacking soap and/or water at home
No facilityNo handwashing facility at home
Why the indicator is a facility
Behaviour is hard to observe in a survey visit, so enumerators ask to see the place where household members usually wash hands and record whether water and soap are there. A facility makes handwashing possible. It does not show that anyone washes at the moments that matter.
Menstrual health indicators
The JMP country file has columns for use of menstrual materials, enough materials, a private place to change, awareness before the first period, ability to reduce pain, comfort seeking help and participation in school, work and social activities. For India every one of these columns is empty (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
India's JMP hygiene estimate in 2024 is 89.7% basic, 8.9% limited and 1.4% with no facility (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How the JMP turns surveys into a yearly line
The JMP does not run its own survey. For India it lists inputs from the Census, NSS rounds, NFHS rounds, DLHS, IHDS, LASI, the 2023 Household Consumption Expenditure Survey and the 2023 Comprehensive Annual Modular Survey, alongside administrative records from Jal Jeevan Mission, Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen and Urban), the Central Pollution Control Board and others. It fits trend lines through these points and reads off a value for each year.
The minimum rule
For safely managed drinking water the JMP takes the lowest of three proportions among people using improved sources, which are accessible on premises, available when needed and free from contamination. It reports the estimate only if quality data cover at least half the population and accessibility or availability data are also present (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025, Charts SM notes).
What this means for the reader
A smooth JMP line between survey years is a fitted value. When the inputs disagree, the fit sits between them. Section 5 shows the rural open defecation points the JMP used for India, which range from under 1% to over 25% for nearby years.
Values the JMP chose not to use appear in square brackets in its data summary sheet. Open the country file before quoting a single year.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
An improved source describes the technology at the source
The word improved carries a lot of weight in WASH statistics. It classifies the type of source or toilet, on the reasoning that some designs are more likely to deliver safe water or contain excreta. It does not record whether the water tested clean on the day, whether the tubewell runs dry in May, or whether the pit overflows into a drain.
Two households, one category
A household with a tap in the yard that runs two hours a day and a household with a handpump 25 minutes away whose water carries fluoride above the limit can both be counted as using an improved source. Their risks are very different.
What the quality data show
Among Indians using improved sources in 2024, the JMP estimates 91.3% have water free from contamination, 84.5% have it available when needed and 76.4% have it on premises (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025). On-premises access is the lowest, so it sets the safely managed figure.
98.1%
of Indians using an improved drinking water source, 2024
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025
76.4%
using safely managed drinking water, 2024
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025
21.7
percentage points between the two
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Five habits for reading a ladder chart
  • Read the top rung and the bottom rung together. Progress at the top can hide people stuck at the bottom.
  • Check whether a figure is for people or for households. The JMP counts people, NFHS fact sheets mostly count people, NSS highlights count households.
  • Separate rural and urban before comparing states. A state average mixes two different service models.
  • Look for the word estimate. A JMP figure for 2024 is a fitted value. Nobody measured it in that year.
  • Find the oldest input behind the newest year. Several JMP series for India rest on 2021 to 2023 surveys.
A worked example
The JMP shows rural open defecation in India at 10.7% in 2024 (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025). The most recent survey points behind it are the 2023 HCES (18.0%) and the 2023 CAMS (11.4%), both rural, as listed in the JMP data summary. The 2024 figure extends the fitted trend one year past the newest survey. It may turn out to be right, and it is a projection.
Ladders make progress visible. They also make it easy to quote the rung that flatters a programme. Quote the full ladder.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
03
Section Three
India's numbers from the JMP, NFHS and NSS
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
India's WASH ladders in 2024, as the JMP estimates them
RungDrinking waterSanitationHygiene
Safely managed76.4%Not estimated nationallyNot defined
Basic19.3%83.4% at least basic (see note)89.7%
Limited2.3%9.9% (shared facilities)8.9%
Unimproved1.5%0.0%Not defined
Surface water / open defecation / no facility0.4%6.7%1.4%
The country file computes a safely managed sanitation value of 62.8% from in-situ disposal assumptions, and also flags that the data are insufficient for a national estimate. The JMP records no sludge as emptied and treated and puts treated wastewater at 5.9% of the population. Quote the sanitation top rung for India with that caveat, or quote at least basic, which is 83.4% (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
A population of about 145 crore (UN figures used by the JMP) means 6.7% open defecation is still roughly 9.7 crore people in 2024.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
India's water and sanitation ladders since 2000
India, JMP estimates, % of population, 2000-2024
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025 (washdata.org); fitted values from survey and administrative inputs
Water access was high and rising before either mission began. Sanitation is the larger story. In 2000 nearly three in four Indians defecated in the open. The JMP line falls steadily through the Swachh Bharat years, and Section 5 explains why the survey points under that line disagree with each other.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Rural and urban India sit on different rungs
Indicator, 2024RuralUrbanTotal
Safely managed drinking water72.6%83.0%76.4%
Drinking water accessible on premises72.6%83.0%76.4%
Free from contamination88.1%96.8%91.3%
At least basic sanitation81.0%87.4%83.4%
Shared (limited) sanitation8.3%12.6%9.9%
Open defecation10.7%0.0%6.7%
Sewer connection1.9%38.2%15.3%
Basic hygiene85.9%96.1%89.7%
Rural
Sanitation is mostly on-site, with pits and septic tanks serving 87.5% of rural people. Water quality is the weaker link. Among rural people using improved sources, 11.9% do not have water free from contamination (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
Urban
Shared toilets are commoner in towns, 12.6% against 8.3%. Fewer than four in ten urban residents are on a sewer, so most urban excreta still depends on emptying services (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
For safely managed water, the binding constraint is the tap at home
Components of safely managed drinking water, India, 2024 (%)
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025, Charts SM sheet
Because the JMP takes the minimum of the three criteria, whichever is lowest decides the safely managed figure. For India that is on-premises access, so a working Jal Jeevan Mission tap can add directly to SDG 6.1. Quality sits at 91.3%, but it rests on far fewer tests than access does, and a contaminated tap at home still counts as accessible.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What the National Family Health Survey reports, round by round
Indicator (India, total)NFHS-4 2015-16NFHS-5 2019-21NFHS-6 2023-24
Population with an improved drinking-water source89.9%95.9%96.5%
Population in households using an improved sanitation facility48.4%70.2%Not on the fact sheet
Children under 5 with diarrhoea in the past 2 weeks9.2%7.3%7.9%
Women 15-24 using hygienic menstrual protectionNot compared here77.3% (77.6% in NFHS-6 comparison column)79.2%
Rural and urban, NFHS-6
Improved drinking water reached 99.1% urban and 95.4% rural. Diarrhoea prevalence among under-fives was 6.7% urban and 8.3% rural, up from a national 7.3% in NFHS-5 (NFHS-6 India fact sheet (provisional), IIPS, May 2026).
Reading the rows
NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 values come from MoSPI's eSankhyiki NFHS dataset (NFHS-5 India fact sheet, IIPS, via MoSPI eSankhyiki). NFHS-6 values come from the provisional fact sheet released in May 2026. The diarrhoea rise is small and the survey asks about a two-week window, so season of fieldwork matters.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The NFHS-6 India fact sheet carries no sanitation indicator
NFHS-5 reported the share of the population living in households that use an improved sanitation facility, 70.2% in 2019-21. The NFHS-6 India fact sheet released in May 2026 reports 101 key indicators and none of them concerns sanitation, toilets or handwashing. Its household profile keeps electricity, improved drinking water, iodised salt, insurance and bank accounts (NFHS-6 India fact sheet (provisional), IIPS, May 2026).
What is lost
NFHS was the only national survey that measured sanitation in the same households as child height, anaemia and diarrhoea. Without it, a district cannot set its stunting figure beside its sanitation figure from one sample. Researchers will need the unit-level data, if it is released, or other surveys.
Where to look instead
NSS rounds, including the 76th round of 2018 and the 2020-21 round, and the 2023 HCES and CAMS surveys, carry household latrine questions, and the JMP lists them as inputs. The ImpactMojo Deep Dive What NFHS-6 stopped counting collects the readings on this gap.
When a programme report cites NFHS-6 for sanitation, the citation is wrong. Ask which survey the figure came from.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The most detailed national WASH survey India has run
The NSS 76th round surveyed 1,06,838 households between July and December 2018 on drinking water, sanitation, hygiene and housing. It asked about the principal source, whether supply was sufficient through the year, distance, treatment, latrine type, who used the latrine and how often, water near the latrine and handwashing practice (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019).
HighlightRuralUrban
Used an improved source of drinking water94.5%97.4%
Drinking water within household premises58.2%80.7%
Sufficient drinking water throughout the year87.6%90.9%
Improved source on premises, sufficient all year51.4%72.0%
Access to a latrine71.3%96.2%
Bathroom and latrine both within premises48.0%86.1%
Drinking water not treated72.8%50.9%
The round was fielded ten months before the national ODF declaration, so its latrine figures describe the final year of the construction drive.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
In 2018 latrine access still followed household spending
Rural households with access to a latrine, by consumption quintile, 2018 (%)
NSS 76th round, Report No. 584, via MoSPI eSankhyiki (indicator 20)
A 33-point gap separated the poorest and richest rural fifths four years into Swachh Bharat. In urban India the poorest fifth was at 86.2%. Any later claim of universal coverage has to explain how the poorest rural households closed a gap of this size in the final year.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
04
Section Four
What Swachh Bharat Mission built
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen): the aim and the design
Swachh Bharat Mission (Grameen) was launched on 2 October 2014 with the aim of eliminating open defecation and achieving ODF status by 2 October 2019, the 150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi. Phase II began on 1 April 2020 with a focus on keeping villages ODF and adding solid and liquid waste management. The programme has been extended to 2026-27 (DDWS note on SBM(G) Phase II, January 2026).
The household incentive
An incentive of ₹12,000 is paid for building an individual household latrine to BPL households and to identified APL households, namely SC and ST households, small and marginal farmers, landless labourers with homestead, persons with disabilities and women-headed households. States may add to it from their own share (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB).
Who pays
The Centre and states share costs 90:10 in the eight north-eastern states, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu and Kashmir, 60:40 in other states, and the Centre pays all of it in Union Territories. Phase II also draws on 15th Finance Commission grants to rural local bodies (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB).
A subsidy paid on construction gives every official an incentive to report construction. Use is nobody's line item unless the programme makes it one.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Twelve crore latrines and the money behind them
12 crore+
individual household latrines built since 2 October 2014
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB, IMIS, 16 December 2025
2.67 lakh
community sanitary complexes built
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB, IMIS, 16 December 2025
₹93,723 crore
central share used, 2014-15 to 2024-25
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB
₹1.40 lakh crore
total programme outlay of Phase II
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB
Where the numbers come from
Every figure on this slide is what states report on the SBM(G) management information system (IMIS). A latrine is entered when it is built. The record says nothing about whether the household uses it five years later, whether the pit has filled, or whether the structure still stands.
Maintenance as a campaign
The Hamara Shauchalay, Hamara Bhavishya campaign from 19 November to 10 December 2025 reported repair and beautification of more than one lakh household toilets and over 550 community complexes (DDWS note on SBM(G) Phase II, January 2026). A campaign that repairs toilets is also evidence that many need repair.
Twelve crore toilets is a large public works achievement. It is a count of structures, and the next section treats it as one.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What the ODF Plus (Model) label requires
ODF Plus (Model) village
A village which is sustaining its ODF status, has arrangements for both solid waste management and liquid waste management, observes visual cleanliness (minimal litter, minimal stagnant wastewater, no plastic waste dump in public places) and displays ODF Plus IEC messages (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB).
Phase II indicator, December 2025Reported
Villages declared ODF Plus (Model)4,89,526
Villages verified ODF Plus (Model)4,15,915
Villages with solid waste management arrangements5.27 lakh+
Villages with liquid waste management arrangements5.41 lakh+
Blocks with plastic waste management5,300+
Functional community biogas plants under GOBARdhan970+
Declared and verified differ by about 74,000 villages. A declaration is a statement by the village. Verification is a further check recorded in the same programme system. Neither is an independent household survey. Source: DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB, IMIS as on 16 December 2025.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) and its four certifications
CertificationWhat it requires, in the mission's words
ODFAll households have access to toilets and there is no open defecation
ODF+At any point of the day, not a single person is found defecating and/or urinating in the open, and all community and public toilets are functional and well maintained
ODF++Sewage including faecal sludge and septage safely managed and treated, with no open discharge or dumping
Water+All domestic used water, including septage, is collected and treated to a satisfactory level and treated effluent is reused before excess is released
Timeline
SBM-U launched on 2 October 2014. The ODF protocol came in 2016, ODF+ and ODF++ protocols in 2018, the Water+ protocol in 2019, and SBM-U 2.0 in October 2021 (SBM-Urban 2.0 portal, sbmurban.org, read October 2026).
Used water in SBM-U 2.0
SBM-U 2.0 added a used water management component. One of its objectives is to eradicate hazardous entry into sewers and septic tanks by mechanising cleaning (Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 1 April 2026).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What the government says Swachh Bharat achieved
As a result, by October 2019, all villages across the country had declared themselves ODF with this rural sanitation coverage increased from 39% in 2014 to 100% in 2019.
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB
What the sentence measures
It reports declarations by villages and a coverage figure from the programme's own records. Coverage here means households recorded as having a toilet. It is an access measure, the first of the four measurements in Section 1.
Other claims in the same documents
The DDWS note of January 2026 says a NITI Aayog evaluation found 96% of villages achieved ODF Plus status by March 2025, and cites the JMP 2024 report as showing 67% of India's rural population using safely managed sanitation (DDWS note on SBM(G) Phase II, January 2026). The second figure rests on JMP assumptions about pits that are never emptied, as Section 3 explained.
A claim made in good faith by a programme about its own records is still a claim about records. The next section sets it beside surveys of people.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How targets were enforced, according to the people surveyed
In late 2018 a team from r.i.c.e. revisited households in rural Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh first surveyed in 2014. Data were collected on 9,812 people and 156 local officials were interviewed (as reported by Down To Earth, 2019). The paper reports that many respondents said the mission tried to coerce latrine construction, including by withholding or threatening to withhold government benefits (Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019).
Over 1 in 2
respondents had heard of coercion in their village
Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019, via Down To Earth
Over 2x
likelihood that Dalit toilet-owning households experienced coercion, against others
Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019, via Down To Earth
Nearly 3x
Scheduled Tribe households' likelihood, against others
Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019, via Down To Earth
Forms reported
Stopping people from defecating in the open, fines, and threats to cut rations or other benefits (Down To Earth report of the survey).
What the authors asked for
A transparent public discussion of the mission's costs, benefits and results based on evidence, as their abstract puts it (Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Open defecation did fall fast, and the surveys agree on that
70% to 44%
people over two defecating in the open, four north Indian states, 2014 to 2018
Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019
44.4% to 10.7%
rural open defecation, JMP estimate, 2014 to 2024
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025
What changed
Every source used in this course shows a large fall in open defecation after 2014. The r.i.c.e. panel shows a 26-point fall in four years in the states where open defecation was most common, and 57% of its households that had no latrine in 2014 had one by 2018 (Down To Earth report). The JMP rural line falls by about 34 points from 2014 to 2024. It also fell by about 34 points from 2004 to 2014, so the fitted trend shows no break at 2014, which is a reason to read the survey points directly.
What did not change as fast
Use among owners, the treatment of children's faeces, the emptying of pits, and the caste division of the work of emptying them. These appear in Sections 5 and 9.
How to say both
Open defecation fell steeply, and it did not reach zero by October 2019. Both statements are supported by the same surveys. A report that makes only one of them is choosing a side.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
05
Section Five
ODF claims and the survey evidence
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Declared, verified and measured mean different things
Declared ODF
The village or its panchayat states that no one defecates in the open, and the status is entered in the programme MIS.
Verified ODF
A later check of the declaration under the programme's own protocol. It is carried out within the government that runs the programme.
Measured open defecation
A sample survey asks households or individuals where they usually defecate, and estimates the share for a population with a known margin of error.
Why the gap is structural
A declaration is binary for a whole village. A survey measures a share of people. A village where 90% of people use toilets is not ODF by definition, yet a declaration can still be filed for it.
Incentive
Officials whose performance is judged on declarations have reason to file them early. Surveys run by statistical agencies have no such stake, which is why they are the right check on a declaration.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
One question, several answers for the same years
SourcePeriodMeasureFigure
SBM(G) recordsOctober 2019Rural sanitation coverage (access)100%
NSS 76th roundJuly-Dec 2018Rural households with latrine access71.3%
r.i.c.e. panel, 4 statesSept-Dec 2018People over two defecating in the open44%
NFHS-52019-21Rural open defecation, as used by JMP25.5%
NSS 78th round2020-21Rural open defecation, as used by JMP20.7%
HCES2023 (JMP label)Rural open defecation, as used by JMP18.0%
CAMS2023 (JMP label)Rural open defecation, as used by JMP11.4%
JMP estimate2024Rural open defecation (fitted)10.7%
Sources: DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB; NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019; Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019; survey points from the JMP India country file, Data Summary sheet (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025). The r.i.c.e. figure covers four states with high open defecation in 2014 and is not a national estimate.
No survey in this table supports universal toilet use in 2019. Every survey shows a large fall from 2014.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Rural open defecation in the data the JMP compiled
Rural open defecation (% of people) by survey, as compiled by the JMP for India
WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025, Data Summary sheet; NARSS as labelled in the file
Amber bars are the NARSS series. It put rural open defecation at 6.8% in 2019 and 0.8% in 2020, while NFHS-5, fielded over 2019-21, found 25.5% and the NSS 78th round found 20.7%. The JMP used all of these points, so its fitted line runs between them.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Five reasons two surveys of one year give different answers
ReasonHow it moves the figureWhat to check
Who answersOne household respondent may speak for all members, including those who still go outsideIs the question asked of each member?
Question orderAsking about scheme benefits first can make a respondent report a toiletRead the questionnaire
UnitHouseholds with a latrine differ from people who use oneHousehold or person?
Who runs itA survey commissioned by the programme has a stake in the answerAgency and funder
Timing and seasonUse falls when pits fill or water is shortMonths of fieldwork
The ImpactMojo Deep Dive on NFHS-6 summarises a study finding that asking about each member records more open defecation than asking one question about the household, with a larger gap in households that had received help to build a latrine. Read the source before relying on the size of that gap.
When two numbers disagree, explain the gap before choosing one.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The NSS flagged its own latrine figure
It may be noted that there may be respondent bias in the reporting of access to latrine as question on benefits received by the households from government schemes was asked prior to the question on access of households to latrine.
NSS Report No. 584, Highlights, item 9
What the NSO is saying
Households were first asked which government benefits they had received. A household that had just said it received toilet support may then report having a toilet, whether or not it uses one or whether it was completed. The statistical office printed that caveat beside its headline number.
What a practitioner takes from it
Order your own questionnaire so that use and facility questions come before any question on scheme benefits. Ask to see the latrine. Record its state, whether the pan is clean, whether the pit is connected and whether it is being used to store fuel or grain.
The 71.3% rural access figure from 2018 may be an overstatement by the survey's own account. It is still well short of 100%.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Owning a latrine and using it are separate facts
What the NSS 76th round found
Among households with access to a latrine, 94.7% of rural males and 95.7% of rural females used it regularly, and 3.5% of rural household members never used it. In urban areas 98.0% of males and 98.1% of females used it regularly (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Statements 15-16).
What the r.i.c.e. panel found
In the four states it surveyed, 23% of people over two in households with a toilet still defecated in the open in 2018 (Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019, as reported by Down To Earth). The survey asked each member, and it was fielded in the states where open defecation had been most common.
The two figures cover different populations and use different questions. The NSS is national and asks about usual practice. The r.i.c.e. panel asks about the last time each person defecated, in four states with the highest open defecation in 2014. Both agree that some owners do not use their latrines. They disagree about how many.
3.5%
rural members of latrine households who never used it, 2018
NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019
23%
toilet owners over two who defecated in the open, 4 states, 2018
Gupta et al., IZA Discussion Paper 12065, 2019
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Why some owners avoid the latrine they have
Diane Coffey and Dean Spears argue in Where India Goes: Abandoned Toilets, Stunted Development and the Costs of Caste (HarperCollins India, 2017) that rural north Indians avoid affordable pit latrines because emptying a pit is associated with the work that caste assigned to Dalits. A household that will not empty its own pit, and will not be seen hiring someone to do it, prefers a large septic tank it cannot afford or no latrine at all.
What it predicts
Use is lower where latrines are small pits, and owners report fear of the pit filling quickly. Households build large tanks when they can. The work of emptying falls on Dalit workers, often by hand, which links Swachh Bharat to the law on manual scavenging in Section 9.
What a programme can do
Promote twin pits with the fact that a rested pit holds decomposed material (NSS defines a rest period of one and a half years), make mechanised emptying available and visible, and never assign emptying to caste-identified workers.
Treat the caste argument as a hypothesis to test in your district, with questions on pit size, fear of filling and who empties.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Questions to ask of any ODF claim
  • Is the figure a declaration, a verification or a survey estimate?
  • Who collected it, and does that agency run the programme?
  • Is the unit a village, a household or a person?
  • Was each household member asked, including children's faeces disposal?
  • When was fieldwork, and in which season?
  • Were scheme-benefit questions asked before facility questions?
  • When pits fill, who empties them, and how?
Using it in a district
Take the district's ODF Plus status from the SBM(G) dashboard. Then visit a random sample of hamlets at dawn, the time when open defecation is most visible, and ask each member of sampled households where they went yesterday. Record the state of each latrine. A one-week exercise of this kind tells a programme more about use than any declaration.
For a reading list on why toilets are built and not used, see the ImpactMojo Deep Dive Water, Sanitation, and the Behaviour Gap.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
06
Section Six
Jal Jeevan Mission, from taps to working water
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Jal Jeevan Mission promises a working tap in every rural home
Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) was launched on 15 August 2019 to provide a functional household tap connection to every rural household. When it began, about 3.23 crore rural households had a tap connection (Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Patil, reported by All India Radio, 16 March 2026). The February 2025 Budget extended the mission to 2028 with an enhanced total outlay to reach 100% coverage (Budget Speech 2025-26, para 55).
Functional Household Tap Connection (FHTC)
A tap connection to a rural household for providing drinking water in adequate quantity of prescribed quality on regular basis (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
The service standard
Adequate quantity means at least 55 litres per capita per day. Prescribed quality means the BIS:10500 drinking water standard, which JJM adopted for tap water service delivery (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025).
Har Ghar Jal
On the JJM dashboard, Har Ghar Jal means all households in a unit are provided with tap water supply. Districts, blocks, panchayats and villages are shown as reported or certified, and certified units are included in the reported count. Both describe connections.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Tap connections grew about five-fold in six years
Rural households with a tap connection, India (crore)
All India Radio, 16 March 2026; Budget Speech 2025-26; DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB (JJM-IMIS, 26 December 2025)
The Budget Speech 2025-26 described 15 crore households as 80% of India's rural population. The December 2025 review puts 81.47% of rural households at Har Ghar Jal status, and the minister spoke of about 3 crore more connections in the next phase. These are administrative counts of connections from JJM-IMIS.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
A connection is counted once, and water has to arrive every day
What IMIS records
The JJM management information system records a connection when the pipe and tap are installed and the household is listed. Villages then move to Har Ghar Jal reported and, later, certified status on the dashboard. Neither step measures how many litres arrive or whether they are safe.
What the mission now says
The December 2025 review describes 2025 as a shift from infrastructure creation to service delivery, with attention to regularity, adequacy, quality and sustainability (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). That is an admission that the first count was of pipes.
StageWho reportsWhat it shows
Scheme sanctionedState water departmentMoney committed
Connection providedImplementing agency into IMISPipe and tap installed
Har Ghar Jal reportedState, on the JJM dashboardAll households connected
Har Ghar Jal certifiedState, on the JJM dashboardConnection status confirmed
FunctionalThird-party assessmentQuantity, regularity and quality on the day
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How the functionality assessment was designed
For 2021-22 the National Jal Jeevan Mission engaged HTA-Kantar Public to assess household tap connections. The sample was 13,303 villages (5,298 of them Har Ghar Jal) and 2,98,377 households in 712 rural districts of 33 states and UTs, drawn with probability proportional to size from villages with piped schemes of 20 or more connections. Enumerators measured quantity, tested pH and residual chlorine on site, and sent samples to NABL-accredited district labs for twelve parameters (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
CriterionFully functionalPartially functionalNon-functional
Quantity55 lpcd or moreOver 40 to under 55 lpcdUnder 40 lpcd
RegularityDaily, 12 months9-12 months or less than dailyUnder 9 months or less than daily
QualityPotablePotableNon-potable
A connection is fully functional only if all three conditions hold at once. This is the right standard, and the assessment deserves credit for publishing it.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Five in eight households had a fully functional tap in 2022
Household tap connections, national, functionality assessment 2022 (%)
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report (HTA-Kantar Public), executive summary
* Among households whose connection was working. The fully functional share meets all three conditions together. In Har Ghar Jal villages 91% of connections worked and 69% were fully functional. In aspirational districts 78% worked and 62% were fully functional (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How often the tap runs, and for how long
74%
households receiving water all seven days
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
3 hours
average daily duration of supply
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
8%
receiving water only once a week
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
What households said
Four in five households said the tap met their daily needs. Of the 26% without daily supply, 4% received water five or six days a week, 14% three or four days and 8% once a week. More than half (57%) purified water before drinking, and no more than 3% used RO. Only 35% paid any service charge (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Why intermittent supply matters for health
Pipes that empty between supply hours can draw in contaminated water through leaks, and households store water for days in containers that are easy to contaminate. Intermittent supply turns a piped system back into a storage problem.
What to monitor
Days of supply in the past week, hours per day, and whether the household used another source. Ask in the dry season as well as after the monsoon. A single visit gives a snapshot of a service that varies by month.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Testing water is harder than laying pipe
What the 2022 assessment found about testing
District labs could return results for only 83% of the samples submitted. A lab could test 30 to 40 samples in 24 hours, for want of trained technicians and reagents, and turnaround was usually over 48 hours. Of samples tested, 93% were free of bacteriological contamination. Residual chlorine within permissible limits was found in about a quarter of households (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Capacity reported in December 2025
2,863 water testing laboratories, of which 1,682 are NABL-accredited. Over 51 lakh samples tested in labs in 2025-26 up to 29 December 2025, and over 37 lakh samples tested with field test kits by trained village women in the same period (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB).
83%
of submitted samples the district labs could report on, 2022
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
93%
of tested samples free of bacteriological contamination
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
2,863
water testing labs, 1,682 accredited, December 2025
DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Who runs the scheme after the contractor leaves
JJM expects each village to form a village water and sanitation committee (VWSC), also called a Pani Samiti. The 2022 assessment says the JJM Operational Guidelines mandate more than 50% women members, and it measured how many villages had formed one and what it did (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report). Its first recommendation was to scale up VWSC participation in O&M.
Finding, 2022Share
Villages that had constituted a VWSC or Pani Samiti38%
Of those, with more than half the members women40%
Villages where the VWSC was responsible for O&M14%
Villages with identified skilled manpower for O&M31%
Villages with field test kits available30%
Households aware of a grievance mechanism71%
Households that filed a complaint in the past year5%
Households whose complaint was resolved3%
From April 2025 states have inspected four schemes a month chosen by the national mission, and 1,117 schemes had been assigned by December 2025 (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). Joint inspections are run by government teams.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
07
Section Seven
Groundwater depletion and contamination
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
India's groundwater account for 2025
448.52 BCM
annual groundwater recharge
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025
407.75 BCM
annual extractable resource
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025
247.22 BCM
annual extraction for all uses
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025
60.63%
stage of extraction, India as a whole
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025
How the account is built
The Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) and state governments assess dynamic groundwater resources every year. The stage of extraction is annual extraction for irrigation, industry and domestic use divided by the extractable resource (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025).
Why drinking water depends on it
In 2018 the hand pump was the principal drinking water source for 42.9% of rural households (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019). Piped schemes that draw on borewells share the aquifer with irrigation pumps, so drinking water competes with farming for one stock.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
One block in ten extracts more than it recharges
Groundwater assessment units by category, India, 2025 (number of units)
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025, reply to Parliament on the 2025 assessment
Of 6,762 assessment units, 730 (10.80%) are over-exploited, 201 (2.97%) critical, 758 (11.21%) semi-critical and 4,946 (73.14%) safe. A further 127 (1.88%) are saline. The national average of 60.63% hides these units, which are where drinking water sources fail first.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Why the national figure understates local depletion
Irrigation drives extraction
NITI Aayog's Composite Water Management Index (August 2019) reported that groundwater accounts for 62% of irrigation water and is declining in 52% of cases, and named energy subsidies that promote over-extraction and poor matching of crops to agro-climatic zones among the causes.
Averages hide sinks
A block is assessed as a whole. Within a safe block, a cluster of borewells can draw down the water table around one village. Within an over-exploited block, a hamlet with a protected spring may be fine. Check the block category, then ask what has happened to the depth of local wells.
CategoryStage of extractionWhat CGWA rules impose (2020 guidelines)
SafeBelow 70%Standard regulation
Semi-critical70-90%Stricter conditions and higher charges
Critical90-100%Stricter conditions and higher charges
Over-exploitedAbove 100%Highest charges, no new large-scale industries
Categories: Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025. Regulation: CGWA guidelines of 24 September 2020, as summarised by the Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 29 January 2026.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What CGWB's water quality monitoring found
19.8%
of samples with nitrate above the permissible limit
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025
9.04%
of samples with fluoride above the limit
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025
3.1%
of samples with arsenic above the limit
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025
32.6%
of Punjab trace-element samples above the limit for uranium
Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 17 March 2025
The 2024 report
The Annual Groundwater Quality Report 2024 was based on sampling at 15,259 monitoring locations. In Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Meghalaya and Jammu and Kashmir all samples met BIS standards. Rajasthan, Haryana and Andhra Pradesh showed contamination in isolated pockets (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025).
How the government frames it
Ministry replies describe groundwater as largely potable with localised contamination in isolated pockets. A nitrate exceedance in one sample in five is a monitoring finding about many places at once, and the share in drinking water sources is what a district needs to know.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Responses to arsenic and fluoride, and their limits
Arsenic and fluoride occur naturally in some aquifers and cause harm through years of drinking. The BIS permissible limit for fluoride is 1.5 mg/L (IS 10500:2012, cited by the Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 4 December 2025). Because the harm builds slowly, households often see no reason to stop using a familiar handpump.
ResponseWhat it doesSource
Piped supply from a safe surface sourceReplaces the contaminated source for drinkingAdvice to states, PIB, 10 March 2025
Deep wells with cement sealingTaps arsenic-free aquifers below contaminated ones. 525 wells built, 294 in Uttar PradeshPIB, 4 December 2025
Community water purification plantsInterim treatment in quality-affected habitationsPIB, 4 December 2025
Funding weight10% weight in JJM allocations for population in chemically affected habitationsPIB, 10 March 2025
SurveillanceAnnual reports, half-yearly bulletins and fortnightly alerts from CGWBPIB, 4 December 2025
An interim plant needs electricity, chemicals and an operator. Check whether it runs before counting the habitation as safe.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Recharge, regulation and community management
Atal Bhujal Yojana
Implemented in 80 water-stressed districts in seven states, the scheme trained communities to manage their own groundwater. More than 83,000 rainwater harvesting and recharge structures were built or rejuvenated and more than 9 lakh hectares brought under efficient irrigation (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 29 January 2026).
Mapping and planning
NAQUIM has mapped about 25 lakh sq km of the country's aquifers and district aquifer maps and management plans have been shared for 654 districts. The CGWB Master Plan for Artificial Recharge 2020 outlines about 1.42 crore structures with a potential of about 185 BCM (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025).
Campaigns
Jal Shakti Abhiyan has run annually since 2019 and converges other schemes' funds into recharge works. Mission Amrit Sarovar built or rejuvenated nearly 69,000 ponds (PIB, 4 December 2025).
What to ask of a recharge structure
Where is it relative to the drinking water source? Does it fill? Is it maintained after the campaign year? Recharge counted as structures has the same weakness as toilets counted as structures.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Looking up your block's groundwater before planning a scheme
What to look upWhereWhy it matters
Block category and stage of extractionNational Compilation of Dynamic Ground Water Resources, 2025 (CGWB)Over-exploited blocks need source sustainability in the design
Contaminants by districtCGWB Annual Ground Water Quality Report 2025Fluoride, arsenic, nitrate and uranium need treatment or another source
Aquifer map and management planNAQUIM district planWhere deeper or safer aquifers exist
Quality-affected habitationsJJM dashboard, water quality sectionWhich habitations are counted as affected
Seasonal water levelsCGWB monitoring wellsWhether wells fail before the monsoon
A drinking water project in an over-exploited block that does not plan recharge or an alternative source is planning for its own failure.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
08
Section Eight
Who governs water and sanitation
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Water is a State subject, and the Centre pays and advises
Ministry of Jal Shakti replies to Parliament repeat one sentence. Water is a State subject, and sustainable development and management of water, together with mitigation of quality problems, is primarily the responsibility of State governments. The Central Government supports states with technical and financial assistance through its schemes (PIB, 4 December 2025).
What states do
State public health engineering departments and water supply and sewerage boards build and often run schemes. States choose technologies, set tariffs, appoint staff and decide how far to devolve functions to panchayats and municipalities.
What the Centre does
It designs centrally sponsored schemes such as Jal Jeevan Mission and Swachh Bharat Mission, sets guidelines, shares costs, runs the CGWB and CGWA, and monitors through dashboards. The Central Ground Water Board's monitoring and mapping scheme is spent by the Board itself, without transfers to states (PIB, 18 December 2025).
When a district says a problem is the Centre's, or the Centre says it is the state's, both are partly right. Find out who signs the work order.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Panchayats and municipalities under the 73rd and 74th Amendments
Panchayats
The 73rd Amendment came into force on 24 April 1993. It gave panchayats constitutional status and provided for devolving the 29 subjects listed in the Eleventh Schedule, along with State Finance Commissions and regular elections. The word that matters is may, because each state decides what to devolve.
Municipalities
The Twelfth Schedule lists the functions states may give urban local bodies, including water supply for domestic, industrial and commercial purposes and public health, sanitation, conservancy and solid waste management. In several states water supply and sewerage remain with state boards or engineering departments.
Under Jal Jeevan Mission the village water and sanitation committee is the local institution for the scheme. Under SBM(G) Phase II the gram panchayat receives funds for community sanitary complexes and waste management assets (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). The 2022 assessment found VWSCs in charge of O&M in 14% of villages, a measure of how far devolution had reached by then (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Sources: Constitution of India, Part IX, Part IXA and the Eleventh and Twelfth Schedules; DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB; JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
The Water Act, 1974 set up the Central Pollution Control Board and the State Pollution Control Boards. Together with the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 it is the main law against discharge of untreated effluent and sewage into rivers, lakes and groundwater. CPCB, with the state boards and pollution control committees, sets industry-specific and general discharge standards and the state boards enforce them (Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025).
Why it matters for WASH
Sewage and septage dumped without treatment contaminate the sources that drinking water schemes draw on. The SBM-U ODF++ and Water+ certifications are attempts to make cities treat what they collect, a duty the 1974 Act already implied for discharges.
What practitioners can use
Consent conditions and discharge standards are public documents. A community that sees a drain or tanker discharging into its pond can complain to the state pollution control board, and journalists and researchers can compare a city's treatment capacity with its sewage generation.
The 1974 Act regulates pollution. It does not guarantee anyone a supply of water. Drinking water entitlements come from scheme guidelines.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The institutions a WASH programme deals with
InstitutionRole in WASHWhat to ask it for
DDWS, Ministry of Jal ShaktiRuns JJM and SBM(G)Guidelines, IMIS data, functionality reports
MoHUARuns SBM-U and urban certificationCity certification status, STP and FSTP lists
CGWB and CGWAAssess, map and regulate groundwaterBlock category, quality report, NOCs
CPCB and state pollution boardsEnforce the Water Act, 1974Consent orders, monitoring data
State PHED or water boardBuilds and often runs schemesScheme design, O&M contracts
Gram panchayat and VWSCVillage planning, O&M, user chargesVillage action plan, accounts
Urban local bodySewerage, desludging, toiletsDesludging register, licences
Ministry of Social Justice and NCSKNAMASTE, manual scavenging lawWorker registry, death records
Map these offices for your district before the first field visit. Most WASH failures fall between two of them.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
How WASH money flows, and where it can be traced
Central schemes
SBM(G) shares costs 60:40 with most states, 90:10 with the north-eastern and Himalayan states and Jammu and Kashmir, and pays fully in UTs (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). Under JJM, Uttar Pradesh had been allocated ₹60,816 crore as central share from 2019 to December 2025, and states may use up to 2% of their allocation for water quality monitoring and surveillance (PIB, 4 December 2025).
Convergence
Programmes are told to draw on other money: 15th Finance Commission grants to rural local bodies, rural employment funds and state budgets. The Ministry reported about ₹1.5 lakh crore spent on recharge works through convergence with the rural employment scheme since 2021 (PIB, 18 December 2025).
QuestionWhere to look
How much did my district receive?Scheme dashboards, state budget documents
What was spent on O&M?Panchayat accounts, VWSC records
Who was paid for desludging or repairs?ULB and panchayat payment records
Construction is funded centrally. Operation and maintenance usually is not, and that is where schemes fail.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Channels for complaint and correction
What exists
A national JJM helpline and local grievance channels, monthly joint inspections of four schemes per state since April 2025, review meetings with district collectors (729 DMs and DCs took part in Jal Jeevan Samvad in 2025), and a District Collectors' Peyjal Samvad first held on 14 October 2025 (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB).
How households use them
In 2022, 71% of households knew of a grievance mechanism, 5% had complained in the past year and 3% had their complaint resolved. Of those who complained, 62% went to the pump operator. Awareness and use of the national helpline were low (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
71%
households aware of a grievance mechanism, 2022
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
5%
households that complained in the past year
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
3%
households whose complaint was resolved
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
A complaint channel that resolves three households in a hundred is not carrying the load. Programmes that want feedback should ask for it at the tap, in the village, on a fixed day.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
09
Section Nine
Faecal sludge, sanitation work and the 2013 Act
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Most Indian toilets are not connected to a sewer
Type of latrine used (households with access)RuralUrbanAll
Flush or pour-flush to piped sewer1.6%39.1%17.0%
Flush or pour-flush to septic tank50.9%48.9%50.1%
Flush or pour-flush to twin leach pit or single pit32.3%8.7%22.5%
Pit latrine with slab11.0%1.9%7.3%
Ventilated improved pit1.4%0.4%1.0%
Flush to elsewhere (open drain, open pit, field)0.2%0.6%0.3%
Pit latrine without slab or open pit0.8%0.1%0.5%
In 2018 fewer than one in five Indian households with latrine access used a toilet connected to a sewer. Half used septic tanks. Every septic tank and pit fills, so their safety depends on emptying, transport and treatment services that most towns and nearly all villages did not have (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Statement 13).
The 2024 JMP estimate puts India's sewer connections at 15.3% of the population, 1.9% rural and 38.2% urban (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
On-site sanitation needs a chain of services after the toilet
01
Containment
→
02
Emptying
→
03
Transport
→
04
Treatment
→
05
Disposal or reuse
Where the chain breaks
Septic tanks built without a soak pit or with an outlet to a drain discharge effluent directly. Single pits must be emptied while the contents are fresh. Where desludging trucks are private and unregistered, nothing records where they unload. The JMP country file records no sludge for India as emptied and treated, and treated wastewater at 5.9% of the population.
Greywater and drains
In 2018, 48.1% of rural households living in houses disposed of waste water untreated to open low land or streets, and 71.1% of urban households disposed of it untreated to drains (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Highlights 25). Drains carry septic overflow too, so a city with full toilet coverage can still send its faeces to the river.
ODF counts toilets. Safe sanitation counts the whole chain. A city or village can be the first and not the second.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Twin pits, single pits and septic tanks, as the NSS defines them
Twin leach pit
Excreta go to one of two subsurface pits at a time. When one is full, flow is diverted to the second. The filled pit can be emptied after a rest period of one and a half years, during which pathogens are inactivated and the organic matter decomposed (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Concepts and Definitions).
Single pit
Desludging is needed as soon as the pit fills, which involves handling fresh, undigested excreta. The NSS calls this hazardous to health and says single pits suit only places with a mechanical vacuum tanker or where the pit is abandoned when full.
Septic tank
A watertight underground settling tank. Its treated effluent usually seeps into the ground through a leaching pit. Sludge accumulates and must be removed and treated.
The twin pit is the design that makes manual contact with fresh excreta unnecessary. A programme that builds single pits is building future hazardous work.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What SBM-U reports on treating sludge in towns
Plants on the dashboard
The SBM-U 2.0 portal lists 984 sewage treatment plants of 5 MLD or more and 969 faecal sludge treatment plants of 5 KLD or more. It also lists 3,158 cities declared Safaimitra Surakshit Shehar (SBM-Urban 2.0 portal, sbmurban.org, read October 2026).
What to check in a town
Is the FSTP running, and how many trucks reached it last month? Does the municipality license desludging operators and record each trip? Are operators paid for delivering sludge to the plant? A plant with no trucks arriving treats nothing.
Rural sludge
The 2025 Hamara Shauchalay campaign reported over 10,800 sessions on faecal sludge transport and retrofitting, with 6.43 lakh participants (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). Rural sludge management is at an early stage.
ODF++ as a target
ODF++ requires that sewage, faecal sludge and septage be safely managed and treated with no open discharge or dumping (SBM-Urban 2.0 portal, sbmurban.org, read October 2026). It is the urban certification that measures the chain.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
The Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers Act, 2013
The Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 came into force on 6 December 2013. It bans manual scavenging and the hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks (Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023). It also requires the identification and rehabilitation of people who did this work.
58,098
eligible manual scavengers identified in surveys of 2013 and 2018
Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023
₹40,000
one-time cash assistance paid to each identified family
Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023
2,313
given capital subsidy up to ₹5 lakh for other work
Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023
22,294
given skill training with a ₹3,000 monthly stipend
Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023
What the surveys counted
The 58,098 figure is the number of eligible manual scavengers identified in the two national surveys. It is a count of people the surveys found and accepted. People the surveys missed are not in it, so treat it as a floor.
What the Act covers
The government's summary of the Act says it bans manual scavenging and the hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks. The deaths reported in recent years, on the next slide, are in sewers and septic tanks.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Workers are still dying in sewers and septic tanks
317
sanitation workers who died in hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks, 2021-2025
Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 1 April 2026, citing the National Commission for Safai Karamcharis
What the figure records
Deaths reported to the National Commission for Safai Karamcharis. Deaths not reported, or recorded as accidents, are not in it. Quote the date and the source with any figure on these deaths.
Why they happen
A worker enters a tank or manhole to clear a blockage, without breathing apparatus or a harness, and is overcome by gases. Others enter to rescue him. The 2013 Act bans hazardous cleaning of sewers and septic tanks, so each death records a failure of enforcement as well as of equipment.
Ask who hired the worker, whether a municipality, a contractor, a housing society or a household. Each of them decided to send a person into the tank.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
NAMASTE mechanises the work and registers the workers
The National Action for Mechanised Sanitation Ecosystem (NAMASTE) was launched in 2023-24 for sewer and septic tank workers (SSWs). Its stated outcomes include zero fatalities in sanitation work, all sanitation work done by trained and formalised workers, and no worker in direct contact with human faecal matter (Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 25 July 2023).
NAMASTE componentStatus reported
SSWs profiled and validated89,248
SSWs covered under AB-PMJAY, state schemes and NAMASTE75,710
PPE kitHelmet, eye wear, N95 mask, face mask with filter cartridge, nitrile gloves, safety shoes, body suit
Emergency Response Sanitation UnitsSafety devices in larger ULBs
Capital subsidyFor sanitation machinery, for workers, groups of up to five and private operators
Source: Ministry of Social Justice, PIB, 1 April 2026. The profiling count is of workers in hazardous cleaning, a different group from the 58,098 manual scavengers identified earlier.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
What a WASH programme can do about sanitation work
  • Design toilets that never need manual emptying of fresh sludge, such as twin pits and correctly built septic tanks with soak pits.
  • Map who empties pits and tanks in your area, how they are paid and what equipment they have.
  • Link workers to NAMASTE profiling, PPE and health cover.
  • Write mechanised emptying into any contract, and forbid entry into tanks and manholes.
  • Keep an emergency number for the ERSU or fire service in every village and ward.
  • Record deaths and near misses and report them to the district.
Caste is part of the design brief
The work of emptying pits and cleaning sewers has been assigned by caste, which is why Section 5 linked it to the avoidance of pit latrines. A programme that ignores who will empty the pit has chosen, by default, the people who will. Say so in the programme design and budget for machines.
The ImpactMojo Caste Studies 101 deck covers the history of this work and the law in more depth.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
10
Section Ten
Handwashing and menstrual health
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Handwashing with soap cuts diarrhoea and pneumonia
The systematic review
Curtis and Cairncross pooled intervention and observational studies and estimated that washing hands with soap could reduce the risk of diarrhoeal disease by 42-47%. They warned that many studies were of poor quality and that publication bias could inflate the figure (Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2003).
The Karachi trial
Luby and colleagues randomised squatter neighbourhoods in Karachi to handwashing promotion with soap. Children under five in households with plain soap had 50% lower incidence of pneumonia, and children under fifteen 53% lower incidence of diarrhoea, than controls. Plain soap did as well as antibacterial soap (Lancet, 2005).
42-47%
reduction in diarrhoea risk from handwashing with soap
Curtis & Cairncross, Lancet Infect Dis, 2003
50%
lower pneumonia incidence in under-fives, plain soap households
Luby et al., Lancet, 2005
53%
lower diarrhoea incidence in under-fifteens
Luby et al., Lancet, 2005
These are effects when people do wash. The hard part is getting them to wash at the right moments, every day.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Most households say they use soap after defecation
Households washing hands with water and soap, by occasion, 2018 (%)
NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Statement 19
The NSS counted a household as following a practice if most members usually did. Before meals, 60.4% of households washed with water only. After defecation, 12.4% used ash, mud or sand, 17.9% in rural areas. These are reports, and the next slide shows what observation finds.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Observed handwashing is far lower than reported handwashing
Handwashing with soap at key events, observed, SuperAmma trial, Andhra Pradesh (%)
Biran et al., Lancet Global Health, 2014, doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70160-8
Key events were after defecation, after cleaning a child's bottom, before preparing food and before eating. Observers watched 20-25 households per village and told households the study was about domestic water use. * Control villages received a shortened intervention before the 12-month round.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Changing behaviour without talking about germs
The SuperAmma trial ran in 14 villages of Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, between May 2011 and September 2012. It tested whether a village-level campaign built on emotional drivers of behaviour, with knowledge of disease left out of the message, could change handwashing. The campaign used an animated film, skits and public pledging in community and school events (Biran et al., Lancet Global Health, 2014).
What it found
Handwashing with soap at key events rose from 1% to 37% at six months in intervention villages, against 6% in control villages. At twelve months, after controls received a shorter version, both groups were at 29%.
What to take from it
Baseline handwashing with soap was close to zero by observation. The NSS in 2018 recorded 74.1% of households as using soap after defecation. The two differ in method, place and year, and the gap is a warning about self-report. Messages built on emotion moved behaviour. Fourteen villages is a small trial, and the effect at twelve months was measured after the control group was treated.
If your programme reports handwashing from a questionnaire alone, it is reporting what people say. Budget for some structured observation.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Large trials found little effect of household WASH on growth
TrialSettingWhat was deliveredMain result
Odisha sanitation trial (Clasen 2014)100 villages, OdishaLatrine promotion and construction under TSCCoverage 9% to 63%. Diarrhoea 8.8% vs 9.1%, no effect on helminths or growth
MP TSC trial (Patil 2014)80 villages, Madhya PradeshTSC with World Bank WSP supportImproved sanitation +19 points, adult open defecation -10 points, no child health effect
WASH Benefits Bangladesh (Luby 2018)720 clustersWater, sanitation, handwashing, nutrition armsDiarrhoea fell in sanitation, handwashing and combined arms. No WASH effect on growth
WASH Benefits Kenya (Null 2018)702 clustersSame armsNo arm reduced diarrhoea. Handwashing adherence under 25% by year 2
SHINE Zimbabwe (Humphrey 2019)211 clustersVIP latrine, handwashing stations, soap, chlorineNo effect of WASH on stunting, anaemia or diarrhoea
Sources: Clasen et al., Lancet Global Health, 2014; Patil et al., PLoS Medicine, 2014; Luby et al., Lancet Global Health, 2018; Null et al., Lancet Global Health, 2018; Humphrey et al., Lancet Global Health, 2019.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Why the trials found so little, and what it does not mean
Coverage too low
In Odisha latrine coverage reached 63% of households. If health gains require most of a community to stop open defecation, 63% may be below the threshold. The authors concluded that the expected health outcome cannot be assumed from coverage (Clasen et al., 2014).
Interventions too elementary
The SHINE authors concluded that household-level elementary WASH interventions in rural low-income settings are unlikely to reduce stunting or anaemia. A latrine and a handwashing station leave animal faeces, contaminated soil and neighbours' faeces untouched.
Adherence fades
In Kenya handwashing adherence fell below 25% by year two and water treatment below 45% in year one, so the trial tested an offer that most households stopped using (Null et al., 2018).
What the null does not mean
Bangladesh found lower diarrhoea in the sanitation and handwashing arms. Karachi found large effects of soap. The trials show that small household packages do not change growth. They do not show that safe water and sanitation for whole communities are without health value.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Hygienic menstrual protection, NFHS-5 and NFHS-6
Women aged 15-24 using hygienic methods of menstrual protection (%)
NFHS-5 India fact sheet, IIPS, via MoSPI eSankhyiki; NFHS-6 India fact sheet (provisional), IIPS, May 2026
NFHS-6 counts reusable sanitary pads, disposable sanitary pads, tampons and menstrual cups as hygienic. Its comparison column shows NFHS-5 at 77.6% where the NFHS-5 fact sheet published 77.3%, so the earlier round was recomputed on a revised basis. Compare the NFHS-6 figure with 77.6%, a rise of under two points, and not with 77.3%.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Menstrual health needs water, privacy and disposal
What the JMP would measure
The JMP framework covers use of menstrual materials, enough materials, a private place to wash and change, awareness before the first period, ability to reduce pain, comfort seeking help and participation in school, work and social activities. India has no national estimate on any of these in the JMP file (WHO/UNICEF JMP country file, India, updated August 2025).
What India's surveys show around it
In 2018, 56.6% of rural households had access to a bathroom and 48.0% had both a bathroom and a latrine within their premises (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019). A girl without a private place to change at home or at school may have to manage menstruation without privacy or miss school.
Disposal
Disposable pads enter household garbage, drains and pits. In 2018, 80.4% of rural households living in houses had no arrangement for garbage collection (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Highlights 27). Product promotion without disposal planning moves the problem into the waste stream.
What a programme can measure
Water and a lockable space in school toilets, the method used and its cost, disposal facilities, and whether girls missed school days in the last period. Ask privately, and ask girls, as well as their mothers.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
11
Section Eleven
Climate, drought and water security
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Shortage is already in the household data
12.4%
rural households without sufficient drinking water from the principal source all year, 2018
NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019
43%
households with a tap that faced a shortage in piped supply at some time, 2022
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
40%
of those households with any way to cope
JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report
Reading the two surveys
The NSS 76th round found 87.6% of rural and 90.9% of urban households had sufficient drinking water from their principal source throughout the year (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019). The 2022 JJM assessment found 43% of households with a tap had faced a shortage in piped supply at some time. In Ladakh, Mizoram, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Jharkhand, Odisha and Meghalaya almost six in ten households reported shortages, and the report found seasonal scarcity was being managed by households with limited community action (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
A dry-season visit and a post-monsoon visit to the same village can give two different answers to the question of whether a scheme works. Plan for both.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Irrigation, groundwater and the projected gap
What NITI Aayog reported (2019)
The Composite Water Management Index reported that about 74% of the area under wheat and 65% of the area under rice faces significant water scarcity, that groundwater accounts for 62% of irrigation water, and that best estimates indicate demand will exceed supply by a factor of two by 2030 (NITI Aayog, CWMI, August 2019).
How to use a projection
The doubling figure is a projection made from 2008 demand estimates and assumptions about growth. Attribute it to NITI Aayog and say it is a projection. The 2025 groundwater account, with 730 over-exploited units, is a measurement and carries more weight in a district plan.
PressureHow it reaches drinking waterEvidence on this slide
Irrigation pumpingLowers water tables under village borewellsCWMI 2019; CGWB 2025
Weak monsoon or heatSources fail before the rainsNSS 76; JJM FA 2022
ContaminationFluoride, arsenic and nitrate in deeper or overused aquifersCGWB quality report 2024
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
A pipe network is only as reliable as its source
The December 2025 review describes Jal Jeevan Mission moving from building assets to sustaining service, and names source sustainability planning among the topics in reviews with district collectors (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). The 2022 assessment recorded which villages had groundwater sources and recharge structures, and recommended adding a scheme-level measure of seasonal shortage to future assessments (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Recharge and storage
Jal Shakti Abhiyan has run each year since 2019. Mission Amrit Sarovar built or rejuvenated nearly 69,000 ponds, which store water and recharge groundwater (PIB, 4 December 2025).
Questions for a scheme
Is the source a borewell in an over-exploited block? Has its yield been measured in May? Is there a recharge structure upstream, and is it maintained? Is there a fallback source, and who pays for tankers when the main one fails?
Source sustainability is the climate adaptation measure that a drinking water programme controls directly.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Floods and droughts change how toilets behave
Floods and high water tables
Pits and septic tanks that flood can release excreta into the lanes and into shallow wells nearby. Raised plinths, sealed tanks and planned emptying before the monsoon reduce the risk. DDWS's 2025 toilet repair campaign included awareness on its Climate Resilient Sanitation and Service Delivery Protocol (DDWS note on SBM(G) Phase II, January 2026).
Drought
A pour-flush toilet needs water. When water must be carried, households ration it for drinking and cooking first, and toilet use can fall. In 2018, 4.5% of rural households using a latrine reported no water in or around it (NSS Report No. 584, 76th round (July-December 2018), NSO, 2019, Highlights 15).
Heat
Heat raises water demand for drinking and bathing and can shorten the hours a stretched network supplies. Monitoring in summer catches failures that a winter survey misses.
Design responses
Twin pits sited away from drinking water sources, rainwater storage at schools and anganwadis, and handwashing stations that use little water. Each needs a named person responsible for upkeep.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
A climate risk checklist for a WASH plan
HazardWhat failsWhat to check before investing
DroughtBorewell yields, pour-flush useBlock groundwater category, May yield test, alternative source
FloodPits, septic tanks, shallow wellsFlood history, plinth height, distance from pits to wells
HeatSupply hours, demandSummer supply data, storage capacity
OverextractionWater quality and quantityFluoride, arsenic and nitrate tests at the source
Saline intrusion (coast)Groundwater sourcesWhether the unit is classed saline by CGWB
Groundwater categories and saline units: Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 18 December 2025. Quality: Ministry of Jal Shakti, PIB, 10 March 2025. The checklist turns the evidence in Sections 6, 7 and 11 into questions a programme team can answer in its first month.
Ask each question for the dry season and the wet season separately.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
12
Section Twelve
Monitoring a WASH programme
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Four kinds of WASH data, each with its own typical error
KindExamplesGood forTypical error
Programme MISSBM(G) IMIS, JJM-IMISWhat was built, where, whenRecords construction and declarations. Use is missing
Government-commissioned surveysJJM functionality assessmentsChecking the programme at scaleThe commissioning agency runs the programme
National statistical surveysNSS 76th and 78th rounds, NFHS, HCES, CAMSIndependent population estimatesInfrequent, question order and respondent effects
Independent studies and trialsr.i.c.e. panels, SuperAmma, Odisha trialUse, behaviour and causal effectsSmall areas only
Triangulate
Use the MIS to find where things were built, a statistical survey to find how many people use them, and a small independent check to understand why.
Disclose
Every report should name its data source, its date, its unit and who collected it. Most disputes about WASH numbers disappear once those four facts are on the page.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Indicators that match the ladders
IndicatorDefinition to useHow to collect
Safe drinking water at homeJMP safely managed (on premises, available when needed, free from contamination)Household survey plus water tests
Days of supply last weekCount of days the tap ran, 0-7Household recall, cross-checked at the source
Litres per person per dayMeasured volume divided by members, against 55Bucket and timer at the tap
Toilet use by each memberLast defecation, each person over two, and child faeces disposalIndividual questions, private
Latrine functionalPan clean, water present, pit not full, door worksEnumerator observation
Basic hygieneHandwashing place with soap and water seenObservation of the place
Sludge safely emptiedLast emptying by machine, delivered to a plantHousehold and operator records
Choose few indicators, define them in advance, and keep the definition fixed across rounds so that change means change.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Self-report, observation and spot checks
Self-report
Cheap and fast. Inflated for socially approved behaviour such as handwashing and toilet use. Ask about the last occasion, since usual practice invites the approved answer. Ask each person separately, and put programme-benefit questions at the end, as the NSS's own warning suggests.
Structured observation
An observer records behaviour at key events over several hours. SuperAmma observed 20-25 households per village and told them the study was about domestic water use to reduce bias (Biran et al., 2014). Expensive, and people behave differently when watched.
Spot checks
Look for signs such as a wet pan in the morning, a worn path to the toilet, soap at the handwashing place, faeces in the lanes at dawn. Spot checks are cheaper than observation and harder to fake than a questionnaire.
Combining them
Use self-report for scale, spot checks for a sample, and observation for a sub-sample, and report the gap between them. The gap is itself a finding about how far reports can be trusted in your area.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Monitoring drinking water quality in practice
The 2022 JJM assessment tested twelve critical parameters in district labs. They were turbidity, total hardness, total alkalinity, chloride, ammonia, iron, nitrate, sulphate, total dissolved solids, bacteriological contamination, arsenic and fluoride. pH and residual chlorine were measured on site (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Field test kits
Village women trained to use field test kits tested over 37 lakh samples in 2025-26 up to 29 December 2025 (DDWS Year End Review 2025, PIB). Kits screen for common problems and should trigger a lab test when they show a problem.
Lab testing
Labs returned results for 83% of samples in 2022 and took over 48 hours. A bacteriological test only describes the moment of sampling. Repeat tests at the source, the storage tank and the household tap, in more than one season (JJM Functionality Assessment 2022, national report).
Residual chlorine at the tap is the quickest daily check that a piped supply has been treated. In 2022 it was within limits in about a quarter of households sampled.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
A monitoring plan for a district WASH programme
01
Baseline by survey
→
02
Quarterly spot checks
→
03
Seasonal water tests
→
04
Annual use survey
→
05
Public report
  • Draw a random sample of villages and households, and keep it as a panel across rounds.
  • Ask each member about the last defecation, and record child faeces disposal.
  • Measure litres and days of supply at the tap in May and in October.
  • Test water at the source and at a household tap in each sampled village.
  • Record who empties pits and tanks, by what method, and where the sludge goes.
  • Publish the results with the MIS figures beside them, and explain any gap.
Questions for any WASH claim
Is it access, use, safety or function? Who collected it and do they run the programme? Person or household? Which season? What happens after the pit fills? For further reading on use and behaviour, see the ImpactMojo Deep Dive Water, Sanitation, and the Behaviour Gap, and for the survey gap, What NFHS-6 stopped counting.
ImpactMojoWater, Sanitation and Hygiene 101www.impactmojo.in
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 101
Count the toilets, then ask who uses them
100 slides·12 sections·CC BY-NC-ND