| Framing sexual health as | Leads a service to |
|---|---|
| Absence of infection | Test and treat; ignore everything else |
| Absence of unwanted pregnancy | Push contraception; ignore satisfaction and safety |
| Well-being, including pleasure | Ask about relationships, coercion and consent |
| A moral question | Judge, and lose the patient |
| Letter | Most contested in practice |
|---|---|
| Sexual | Yes — pleasure, identity and orientation get dropped |
| Reproductive | Least — the part programmes already fund |
| Health | No |
| Rights | Yes — where it implies autonomy against family or state |
| Life stage | SRHR need | Commonly served? |
|---|---|---|
| Childhood | Body knowledge, safe and unsafe touch | Rarely |
| Adolescence | Puberty, consent, contraception, CSE | Poorly, especially if unmarried |
| Adulthood | Family planning, pregnancy, STIs | Yes — if married |
| Later life | Menopause, ageing, continued sexual health | Almost never |
| Group | Assumption that excludes them |
|---|---|
| Unmarried people | "They should not need this" |
| LGBTQ+ people | Every question presumes a heterosexual partner |
| Persons with disabilities | "They are not sexually active" |
| Older people | "Sexual health ends at menopause" |
| Men | SRHR framed as a women’s service |
| SDG target | SRHR content |
|---|---|
| 3.1 Maternal mortality | Below 70 per 100,000 by 2030 |
| 3.7 Universal SRH access | Family planning, information, education |
| 5.6 Reproductive rights | Decision-making over one’s own body |
| 5.3 Harmful practices | Child marriage and female genital mutilation |
| 4.1 Education | Girls staying in school — downstream of 5.3 |
| Avoid | Prefer |
|---|---|
| Shaming or moralising tone | Neutral, factual, respectful |
| Assuming everyone is heterosexual / married | Inclusive, open questions |
| Euphemism that confuses | Clear, correct anatomical terms |
| Blaming the person | Focusing on rights and support |
| Avoid | Prefer | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "Promiscuous", "loose" | Describe behaviour, not character | Judgement stops disclosure |
| "Your husband" | "Your partner", or ask | Presumes marriage and heterosexuality |
| "Clean" for STI-negative | "Negative", "no infection" | "Clean" makes infection a moral state |
| "Failed to use protection" | "Was not able to use" | Locates the problem in the person |
| Existing right | Applied to sexuality and reproduction |
|---|---|
| Life and health | Emergency obstetric and safe abortion care |
| Privacy | Confidentiality, including for adolescents |
| Equality and non-discrimination | Service regardless of marital status or orientation |
| Freedom from torture and ill-treatment | No coerced sterilisation or forced procedures |
| Information | Comprehensive sexuality education |
| Cairo, 1994 established | Replacing |
|---|---|
| Reproductive rights as human rights | Population control as demographic policy |
| Voluntary, informed choice | Targets and quotas for workers |
| Quality of care as the standard | Number of acceptors as the standard |
| Gender equality as central to the agenda | Fertility treated as a technical problem |
| Before ICPD | After ICPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Demographic targets | Individual well-being and choice |
| Success measured by | Acceptors, method-wise | Need met, quality of care |
| Worker incentives | Per sterilisation performed | Counselling quality |
| The person is | A unit of the target | The decision-maker |
| Bodily autonomy includes | Denied when |
|---|---|
| Saying yes | A person cannot access what they want — contraception, abortion |
| Saying no | Sex, marriage or a procedure is forced |
| Deciding whether to have children | Family or provider decides for them |
| Deciding when and how many | Coercion in either direction — pressure to bear or not to bear |
| The Guttmacher–Lancet definition insists on | Because without it |
|---|---|
| Integration across services | People attend separately for related needs |
| Sexual as well as reproductive health | Pleasure, identity and coercion go unaddressed |
| A defined essential package | Countries claim coverage while omitting components |
| Rights alongside services | Provision can be coercive and still count |
| Essential package element | Most commonly missing |
|---|---|
| Comprehensive sexuality education | Yes — contested and patchily delivered |
| Full contraceptive method choice | Yes — the mix is often narrow in practice |
| Antenatal, childbirth, postnatal care | Postnatal is the weak link |
| Safe abortion and post-abortion care | Yes — providers and facilities are scarce |
| GBV prevention and care | Yes — rarely integrated into SRHR services |
| AAAQ element | Fails when |
|---|---|
| Available | Contraceptive stockouts; no trained abortion provider |
| Accessible | Distance, cost, or refusal to serve unmarried people |
| Acceptable | Judgemental staff; no privacy in the consultation room |
| Quality | Outdated methods; no counselling; unsafe procedures |
| Using | Instead of | Consequence of the euphemism |
|---|---|---|
| Vulva, vagina, penis | "Down there", "private parts" | A child cannot report abuse precisely |
| Menstruation | "Those days", "problem" | Symptoms go undescribed and undiagnosed |
| Erection, ejaculation | Silence | Normal development read as illness |
| Concern raised | Usually |
|---|---|
| Started at 9 | Within the normal range |
| Nothing by 14 | Worth a check-up, not an emergency |
| Uneven or asymmetric development | Normal |
| Distress about timing | The most treatable part — reassurance and information |
| Phase | Roughly | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Menstruation | Days 1–5 | The lining sheds |
| Follicular | Days 1–13 | An egg matures; the lining rebuilds |
| Ovulation | Around day 14 in a 28-day cycle | The egg is released |
| Luteal | Days 15–28 | Fairly consistent length, about 14 days |
| Why the fertile window is wider than one day | Implication |
|---|---|
| Sperm survive several days in the reproductive tract | Sex before ovulation can result in pregnancy |
| The egg is viable for about a day | The window closes quickly afterwards |
| Ovulation timing shifts between cycles | Calendar prediction is approximate |
| Illness and stress move it | Any single cycle can be atypical |
| MHH requires | Absent when |
|---|---|
| Clean materials, changed as needed | Cost or supply puts them out of reach |
| A private space with water and soap | School toilets lack water, doors or locks |
| Safe disposal | No bin, so materials are hidden or flushed |
| Accurate information, before menarche | First period arrives unexplained and frightening |
| Pain management | Dysmenorrhoea treated as something to endure |
| Restriction | Health basis |
|---|---|
| Not entering the kitchen or temple | None |
| Not touching certain foods | None |
| Sleeping separately or outside | None — and dangerous |
| Missing school | None — usually an infrastructure failure |
| Avoiding bathing | None — the opposite of hygiene advice |
| Symptom | Possible cause worth excluding |
|---|---|
| Very heavy bleeding | Anaemia, fibroids, clotting disorders |
| Severe pain disrupting daily life | Endometriosis — typically diagnosed years late |
| Absent periods | Pregnancy, PCOS, thyroid, low body weight |
| Bleeding between periods or after sex | Infection; cervical changes — needs examination |
| Unusual discharge, sores, itching | STI — often silent, always checkable |
| Family planning prevents | Scale |
|---|---|
| Unintended pregnancy | The direct effect |
| Unsafe abortion | Follows from the first |
| High-risk pregnancies | Too young, too close, too many, too old |
| Maternal deaths | Modelling attributes a large share of averted deaths to it |
| Family | Examples | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Barrier | Male & female condoms, diaphragm | Condoms also prevent STIs/HIV |
| Short-acting hormonal | Pills, injectables, patch | User must remember / re-dose |
| Long-acting reversible (LARC) | IUD/IUCD, implant | Years of protection; reversible |
| Permanent | Female & male sterilisation | Intended to be permanent |
| Emergency | Emergency contraceptive pill | After unprotected sex; not routine |
| Fertility-awareness | Cycle tracking, withdrawal | Less reliable in typical use |
| Family | Protects against STIs? | Reversible? | User error possible? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condoms | Yes — the only ones that do | Yes | Yes |
| Pills, injectables | No | Yes | Yes |
| IUD, implant (LARC) | No | Yes | Essentially no |
| Sterilisation | No | Treat as permanent | No |
| Emergency contraception | No | n/a — backup only | Timing matters |
| Method | Perfect use | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Implant | Over 99% | Over 99% |
| IUD | Over 99% | Over 99% |
| Injectable | About 99% | About 96% |
| Pill | Over 99% | About 93% |
| Male condom | About 98% | About 87% |
| Why LARC outperforms | Consequence for counselling |
|---|---|
| No daily or per-act action | Effectiveness does not depend on circumstances |
| Removal requires a provider | Removal on request must be guaranteed |
| Protection needed | Condom alone | LARC alone | Both |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| STIs and HIV | Good | None | Good |
| Emergency contraception fact | The myth it corrects |
|---|---|
| Works mainly by delaying or preventing ovulation | "It causes an abortion" |
| Does not end an established pregnancy | "It is an abortion pill" |
| More effective the sooner it is taken | "Any time within days is equivalent" |
| Available without prescription in India | "A doctor must authorise it" |
| Safe to use more than once | "It damages future fertility" |
| Counselling step | Failure it prevents |
|---|---|
| Present the full range | Method chosen by what the clinic wants to move |
| Give honest side-effect information | Discontinuation without returning |
| Ask about STI risk separately | Pregnancy covered, infection not |
| State that switching and stopping are allowed | A method the person feels trapped in |
| Confirm removal is available on request | LARC becoming coercive in practice |
| Unmet need, India (NFHS-5) | Share of currently married women 15–49 |
|---|---|
| Total unmet need | About 9% |
| Unmet need for spacing | About 4% |
| Modern contraceptive prevalence | About 57% |
| India (NFHS-5, 2019–21) | Figure |
|---|---|
| Modern contraceptive prevalence, married women 15–49 | About 57% |
| Any method | About 67% |
| Total fertility rate | About 2.0 — below replacement |
| Method (NFHS-5) | Share of married women 15–49 |
|---|---|
| Female sterilisation | About 38% — the dominant method by far |
| Male sterilisation | Around 0.3% |
| Condoms | About 10% |
| Pill | About 5% |
| IUD / PPIUD | About 2% |
| Barrier to male involvement | What actually shifts it |
|---|---|
| Vasectomy believed to cause weakness | Accurate information from men who have had one |
| Contraception framed as women’s business | Services that address men directly |
| Clinic hours conflict with wage work | Timings that do not cost a day’s pay |
| No male provider or private space | Basic service design |
| Stage | Where women fall out |
|---|---|
| Pre-pregnancy | Anaemia and nutrition rarely addressed before conception |
| Antenatal | Attends visits; components not delivered |
| Childbirth | Largely closed — 89% institutional |
| Postnatal | Discharged within hours; no contact in the fatal window |
| ANC component | Detects or prevents |
|---|---|
| Blood pressure and urine protein | Pre-eclampsia — silent until severe |
| Haemoglobin | Anaemia — the great indirect killer in the region |
| Syphilis and HIV testing | Transmission to the newborn |
| Fetal growth and position | Obstructed labour |
| Danger-sign counselling | Delay in seeking care |
| Scheme | What it removes |
|---|---|
| JSY (2005) | The cost of deciding and travelling — cash to the mother |
| JSSK (2011) | Every charge at the facility, caesarean included |
| Free referral transport | The 2 a.m. vehicle problem |
| LaQshya, SUMAN | Poor quality and disrespect once she arrives |
| Institutional delivery, India | Share of births |
|---|---|
| NFHS-3 (2005–06) | About 39% |
| NFHS-4 (2015–16) | About 79% |
| NFHS-5 (2019–21) | About 89% |
| Cause of maternal death | The remedy | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Haemorrhage | Oxytocin at delivery; blood | A few rupees a dose |
| Eclampsia | Magnesium sulphate | Cheap; no refrigeration |
| Sepsis | Clean delivery; antibiotics | Low |
| Obstructed labour | Timely caesarean | Needs a theatre and an anaesthetist |
| Unsafe abortion | Legal, safe services | Prevented outright |
| MMR, India (SRS) | Per 100,000 live births |
|---|---|
| 2019–21 | Around 93 |
| SDG 3.1 target, 2030 | National floor of 70 |
| Postnatal window | Risk | Who is watching |
|---|---|---|
| First 24 hours | Postpartum haemorrhage | The facility — if she is still there |
| 24–48 hours | PPH, eclampsia, early sepsis | Often nobody — discharged, not yet visited |
| First week | Sepsis; most newborn deaths | ASHA home visits under HBNC |
| Up to 6 weeks | Late complications, depression | Rarely anyone |
| Cut maternal data by | What appears |
|---|---|
| Wealth quintile | The poorest fifth lags at every stage |
| State | Kerala near 20; highest-burden states above 150 |
| District | Often a wider spread than between states |
| Caste and tribe | Adivasi women furthest from facilities |
| Where abortion is | Result |
|---|---|
| Legal, available, destigmatised | Unsafe abortion effectively disappears as a cause of death |
| Legal but hard to reach | Unsafe abortion persists at scale — India’s situation in much of the country |
| Restricted | Becomes a leading cause of maternal death |
| The MTP Act permits abortion on grounds of | Note |
|---|---|
| Risk to physical or mental health | Interpreted broadly in the rules |
| Substantial fetal abnormality | The only ground beyond 24 weeks |
| Pregnancy resulting from rape | Presumed to constitute grave mental injury |
| Contraceptive failure | Extended to any woman by the 2021 amendment |
| Gestation | Requirement after the 2021 amendment |
|---|---|
| Up to 20 weeks | The opinion of one registered medical practitioner |
| 20–24 weeks | Two practitioners, for categories specified in the rules |
| Beyond 24 weeks | Substantial fetal abnormality only, via a State Medical Board |
| Any stage | Confidentiality protected; disclosure is an offence |
| Comprehensive abortion care includes | Frequently missing |
|---|---|
| Accurate information and counselling | Replaced by dissuasion |
| A method appropriate to gestation | Only one method offered |
| Pain management | Very often |
| Post-abortion contraception | Yes — and predicts repeat presentation |
| Dignity and confidentiality | Names called aloud; no private space |
| MTP Act, 1971 (amended 2021) | PCPNDT Act, 1994 | |
|---|---|---|
| Governs | When abortion may lawfully be performed | Sex determination before birth |
| Purpose | Access to safe abortion care | Preventing sex-selective abortion |
| Restricts abortion? | Sets its lawful conditions | No — it restricts disclosure of fetal sex |
| Provider fear | Rare | Common — and the main cause of wrongful refusal |
| Unsafe abortion means | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Untrained provider | Perforation, incomplete evacuation |
| Unsafe method or setting | Sepsis, haemorrhage |
| Self-medication without information | Wrong dose, wrong gestation, no follow-up |
| Delay caused by stigma or refusal | Later gestation, higher risk |
| Barrier | Remedy |
|---|---|
| Stigma and fear of judgement | Non-judgemental care as a supervised standard |
| Neither client nor provider knows the law | Plain-language guidance; display the entitlement |
| Too few trained providers and approved facilities | Certification at district level |
| Confusion with PCPNDT | Explicit written guidance separating the two |
| No post-abortion contraception | Include it in the same visit |
| STI | Type | Curable? | Often symptomless? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chlamydia, gonorrhoea | Bacterial | Yes — antibiotics | Yes, especially in women |
| Syphilis | Bacterial | Yes | In early stages |
| Trichomoniasis | Parasitic | Yes | Often |
| Herpes, HIV, HPV | Viral | Manageable, not curable | Frequently |
| Prevention tool | Protects against | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Condoms, used consistently | Most STIs, including HIV | Every act |
| Testing | Nothing — but enables treatment | Regularly if at risk |
| HPV vaccination | The types causing most cervical cancer | Ideally before sexual debut |
| Partner treatment | Re-infection | At the same time as the index case |
| HIV transmits through | It does not transmit through |
|---|---|
| Unprotected sex | Sharing food, utensils, toilets |
| Infected blood | Hugging, shaking hands, kissing |
| Shared injecting equipment | Mosquito bites |
| Mother to child, without treatment | Working or studying alongside someone |
| On effective ART | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Viral load becomes undetectable | Life expectancy approaches normal |
| Undetectable = Untransmittable | No sexual transmission to partners |
| Treatment is lifelong | Adherence is the whole intervention |
| Available free in India’s public system | Cost is not the barrier; stigma often is |
| Tool | For whom | When |
|---|---|---|
| PMTCT | Pregnant women living with HIV | During pregnancy, delivery and breastfeeding |
| PrEP | HIV-negative people at higher risk | Ongoing, before exposure |
| PEP | Anyone after a possible exposure | Within 72 hours — the sooner the better |
| Condoms | Everyone | Every act |
| Stigma produces | Public-health consequence |
|---|---|
| Avoiding testing | Late diagnosis; onward transmission |
| Not disclosing to partners | Partners untested and untreated |
| Not collecting medication | Treatment interruption; resistance |
| Dropping out of care | Preventable illness and death |
| STI | Type | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Chlamydia / gonorrhoea | Bacterial | Often silent; curable with antibiotics |
| Syphilis | Bacterial | Curable; dangerous in pregnancy if untreated |
| HIV | Viral | Manageable lifelong with ART |
| Herpes (HSV) | Viral | Manageable, not curable |
| HPV | Viral | Vaccine-preventable; can cause cervical cancer |
| Untreated | Leads to |
|---|---|
| Chlamydia, gonorrhoea | Pelvic inflammatory disease; infertility; ectopic pregnancy |
| Syphilis in pregnancy | Stillbirth, congenital syphilis |
| HIV | Progressive immune damage; AIDS |
| HPV | Cervical cancer, over years |
| Cervical cancer prevention | What it needs |
|---|---|
| HPV vaccination | Delivery before sexual debut — a school-age programme |
| Screening | HPV testing or visual inspection; a recall system |
| Treatment of pre-cancerous lesions | A follow-up pathway that people actually complete |
| Treatment of cancer | Late presentation is the norm; outcomes are poor |
| CSE covers | Not covered by "sex education" |
|---|---|
| Consent and how to refuse | Yes — and it is the safeguarding core |
| Gender and power in relationships | Yes |
| Recognising coercion and abuse | Yes |
| Where to get services | Rarely |
| Anatomy and contraception | This is usually all that is included |
| Domain | What a young person can do afterwards |
|---|---|
| Knowledge | Name what is happening to their body; know it is normal |
| Skills | Say no, and recognise when a no is not being heard |
| Values | Hold that respect and equality apply to them too |
| Access | Know where to go, and that they may go |
| Age band | Content |
|---|---|
| Early primary | Naming body parts; safe and unsafe touch; who to tell |
| Pre-teen | Puberty, menstruation, hygiene, changing bodies |
| Early adolescence | Consent, relationships, gender, online safety |
| Later adolescence | Contraception, STIs, where to get services, rights |
| Feared effect | What the evidence shows |
|---|---|
| Earlier sexual debut | No increase; if anything, later debut |
| More partners | No increase |
| More sexual activity | No increase |
| Increased contraceptive use among the active | Yes — a consistent finding |
| Better recognition of abuse | Yes |
| Outcome | Direction of effect |
|---|---|
| Knowledge and myth correction | Up, consistently |
| Age at first sex | Later, or unchanged |
| Number of partners | Unchanged or fewer |
| Contraceptive and condom use among the active | Up |
| Ability to recognise abuse and seek help | Up |
| What the evidence does not show | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| That CSE causes earlier sexual debut | The central objection, repeatedly tested and unsupported |
| That abstinence-only delays debut | The proposed alternative does not work |
| Myth | Fact |
|---|---|
| It encourages young people to have sex | Evidence shows the opposite or no effect |
| It is 'too much, too young' | Content is age-appropriate and incremental |
| It is against our culture | It builds respect, safety and consent — shared values |
| Silence keeps children safe | Knowledge helps children recognise and report abuse |
| Objection | Response |
|---|---|
| "It encourages sex" | Repeatedly tested; no such effect found |
| "Too much, too young" | Content is matched to developmental stage |
| "Against our culture" | Consent, respect and safety are not foreign values |
| "Silence keeps children safe" | Silence is what abusers rely on |
| "Parents should teach this" | Most do not; CSE supports rather than replaces them |
| In India | Status |
|---|---|
| Adolescence Education Programme | Exists; coverage and content vary widely by state |
| School Health & Wellness Ambassadors | Two trained teachers per school, delivering a set curriculum |
| RKSK | National adolescent health programme, includes SRHR |
| Uniform national CSE curriculum | No — delivery is uneven and politically contested |
| Consent must be | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Freely given | No pressure, threat, deception or economic coercion |
| Informed | They know what they are agreeing to |
| Specific | To this act, not to everything |
| Reversible | Withdrawable at any moment, without justification |
| Ongoing | Checked each time, not inherited from last time |
| Feature | Practical test |
|---|---|
| Freely given | Could they have said no without cost? |
| Informed | Do they know what is proposed? |
| Specific | Have they agreed to this? |
| Reversible | Would a change of mind be respected? |
| Ongoing | Has it been checked this time? |
| Not consent | Why |
|---|---|
| Silence, or not resisting | Freezing is a common response to fear |
| A previous yes | Consent is specific and ongoing |
| Agreement under pressure or deception | Not freely given |
| From someone asleep or heavily intoxicated | Cannot be informed |
| From anyone under 18 | Legally incapable of consenting |
| GBV drives | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Unintended pregnancy | Contraception refused or sabotaged by a partner |
| STIs and HIV | Condom use not negotiable |
| Poor maternal outcomes | Violence in pregnancy; care sought late |
| Non-use of services | Permission to travel withheld |
| Mental-health harm | Sustained, and rarely addressed |
| Survivor-centred principle | In practice |
|---|---|
| Safety first | Ask whether it is safe to go home before anything else |
| Confidentiality | Not to family without consent; know your legal limits |
| Choice | The survivor decides whether to report, not you |
| Non-judgement | Never ask why they stayed, or what they were wearing |
| Referral | Know the pathway before you need it |
| POCSO, 2012 | Provision |
|---|---|
| Scope | All sexual offences against anyone under 18 |
| Reporting | Mandatory — failing to report is itself an offence |
| Procedure | Child-friendly recording, investigation and trial |
| Identity | The child’s identity may not be disclosed |
| Child marriage association | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Early pregnancy | Higher risk of obstructed labour, fistula, eclampsia |
| School dropout | Ends education, usually permanently |
| Less power in the household | Cannot decide to seek care |
| Higher exposure to violence | Large age gaps; no independent standing |
| Indian legal position | Status |
|---|---|
| Consensual same-sex relations | Decriminalised — Navtej Singh Johar, 2018 |
| Transgender rights | Affirmed in NALSA, 2014; self-identification recognised |
| Transgender Persons Act, 2019 | In force; criticised by many trans activists |
| Same-sex marriage | Not recognised |
| Adolescent SRHR need | Barrier |
|---|---|
| Puberty information | Delivered late or not at all |
| Contraception | Providers reluctant to serve unmarried young people |
| STI testing | Fear parents will find out |
| Care after violence | Mandatory reporting deters disclosure |
| Safe abortion | Stigma compounds every other barrier |
| RKSK priority area | SRHR link |
|---|---|
| Sexual and reproductive health | Direct |
| Nutrition, including anaemia | Determines how a first pregnancy goes |
| Mental health | Shapes help-seeking and relationships |
| Substance misuse | Associated with risk and with violence |
| Injuries, violence and gender | Consent, GBV, and safety |
| Barrier | Legal or attitudinal? |
|---|---|
| Provider refuses unmarried adolescent | Attitudinal — no law requires marriage |
| Fear parents will be told | Attitudinal — confidentiality is the standard |
| No privacy in the consultation space | Operational |
| Clinic hours clash with school | Operational |
| Cost and distance | Operational |
| Confidentiality question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Can an adolescent be seen alone? | Yes — and should be offered it |
| Must parents be informed? | Not routinely |
| Is there a limit? | Yes — abuse or serious risk of harm |
| Should the limit be stated up front? | Always, before any disclosure |
| Youth-friendly means | Test it by |
|---|---|
| Accessible | Are the hours compatible with school and work? |
| Acceptable | Is there a private space, and are staff non-judgemental? |
| Equitable | Are unmarried young people served without comment? |
| Effective | Are the right supplies actually in stock? |
| Confidential | Can a visit happen without anyone else knowing? |
| Channel | Reaches | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Peer educators | Those inside the peer network | Needs real training and support |
| Schools | Those still enrolled | Misses the most vulnerable |
| Digital and helplines | Anyone with a phone, privately | Phone access is unequal, especially for girls |
| Community outreach | Out-of-school young people | Slowest and most staff-intensive |
| South Asia | Gained | Still lagging |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal mortality | Substantial falls across the region | Wide state and district spread |
| Contraception | Rising use | Narrow method mix; high discontinuation |
| Institutional delivery | Large increases | Quality inside the facility |
| Adolescent services | Programmes exist | Unmarried young people still turned away |
| Approach to taboo | Result |
|---|---|
| Confront the belief directly | Hardens resistance; work stops |
| Work through trusted local voices | Slower; more durable |
| Reframe as health and safety | Usually accepted |
| Say nothing at all | The taboo continues to cause harm |
| Group most likely to be missed | Why |
|---|---|
| Unmarried adolescents | Assumed not to need services |
| Dalit and Adivasi communities | Distance; discrimination at the facility |
| LGBTQ+ people | Forms and questions do not include them |
| Persons with disabilities | Presumed asexual; facilities inaccessible |
| Rural and remote populations | No trained provider within reach |
| Programme / cadre | Focus |
|---|---|
| ASHA & ANM workers | Community-level SRHR outreach and referral |
| RKSK / AFHCs | Adolescent health, including SRHR |
| JSY / JSSK | Safe, institutional delivery and maternal care |
| NACO | HIV prevention, testing and treatment |
| Family planning programme | Counselling and a basket of methods |
| Platform | Covers | Where to refer |
|---|---|---|
| ASHA and ANM | Community outreach, referral, follow-up | First contact in a village |
| RKSK / AFHCs | Adolescent health including SRHR | Young people, married or not |
| JSY / JSSK | Institutional delivery; free entitlements | Pregnancy and childbirth |
| NACO | HIV testing, treatment, prevention | Free ART and testing |
| One Stop Centres | Support after violence | Survivors needing integrated help |
| Principle | What it rules out |
|---|---|
| Non-judgemental | Comment on the person’s choices or history |
| Confidential | Telling family without consent |
| Complete information | Withholding options you disapprove of |
| Support their decision | Deciding for them, however gently |
| Inclusive | Assuming gender, orientation or marital status |
| Pitfall | Better practice |
|---|---|
| Pushing one method or a target | Offer the full range; respect choice |
| Refusing care to unmarried youth | Serve all who need care, lawfully |
| Moralising or shaming | Stay neutral, factual, supportive |
| Breaching confidentiality | Protect privacy; know safeguarding limits |
| Pitfall | Why it happens | Better practice |
|---|---|---|
| Pushing one method | Targets or stock pressure | Offer the full range; record the choice |
| Refusing unmarried young people | Assumed rule that does not exist | Serve all who need care |
| Moralising | Discomfort | Stay factual; they decide |
| Breaching confidentiality | Telling family "for their good" | Protect privacy; know the limits |
| Check | Ask yourself |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Am I sure, or repeating what I was told? |
| Judgement | Would I say this to someone I respected more? |
| Privacy | Can this conversation be overheard? |
| Inclusion | Have I assumed anything about this person? |
| Law and pathway | Do I know the actual rule, and where to refer? |
| Source | Use it for |
|---|---|
| WHO | Clinical guidance and the definitions themselves |
| Guttmacher Institute | Research and the Guttmacher–Lancet definition |
| UNFPA | Programme guidance and regional data |
| UNESCO ITGSE | What age-appropriate CSE content actually looks like |
| NFHS and SRS (India) | The numbers for your own state and district |
| Takeaway | The practice failure it prevents |
|---|---|
| SRHR is a right | Treating care as a favour that can be withheld |
| Condoms protect twice | Pregnancy covered, infection not |
| Abortion is legal under the MTP Act | Wrongful refusal, usually from PCPNDT confusion |
| CSE does not increase sexual activity | Conceding the argument that blocks it |
| Be non-judgemental and inclusive | The barrier that keeps people away entirely |