Supreme Court flags 40-year trial delay, finds case papers lying with it since 2013
Cite this
Citations are auto-generated; verify before publishing. The research classification is PolicyDhara's, not the source's.
Research or analytical publication — an evidence-based assessment informing policy design and evaluation. Shapes the intellectual framework within which policy debates occur.
Summary
The Supreme Court’s attempt to probe a four-decade delay in a criminal trial led to an unexpected moment of institutional introspection, as it emerged that the proceedings had effectively remained frozen for over a decade because the original records had been requisitioned by the top court in 2013, and never returned.