| Level | What gender shapes | South Asian example |
|---|---|---|
| Individual | Beliefs, skills, aspirations, bodily autonomy | A girl's own expectation of marrying at 18 or studying further |
| Household | Who works, who eats first, who owns, who decides | Land titled to the eldest son under customary practice |
| Community and market | Norms on mobility, caste and occupation, wages | Lower daily wages for women in casual agricultural work |
| State | Laws, schemes, budgets, representation | One-third of panchayat seats reserved for women under Article 243D |
| Question | Counting women | Analysing relations |
|---|---|---|
| Who attends training? | Number of women trained | Who released time for her to attend, and who covered her work |
| Who owns land? | Share of plots with a woman's name | Who decides on sale, mortgage and crops on that plot |
| Who earns? | Women's income | Who spends it and on what |
| Question | WID answer | WAD answer |
|---|---|---|
| Why are women poor? | They were left out of development | They were included on exploitative terms |
| Unit of analysis | Women as individuals | Class and the world economy |
| What to do | Projects to integrate women | Change the structures of production and trade |
| Feature | WID | GAD |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Women | Relations between women and men |
| Problem | Exclusion from development | Unequal power |
| Goal | Efficiency, integration | Equality, transformation |
| Women seen as | Beneficiaries | Agents of change |
| Typical tool | Women's project | Gender analysis of all projects |
| Role | What it covers | Planning implication |
|---|---|---|
| Reproductive | Childbearing, care, cooking, water, fuel | Unpaid, so ignored in plans and in GDP |
| Productive | Work for income or subsistence | Women's farm and home-based work is undercounted |
| Community managing | Running local services, often unpaid | Projects assume women's volunteer time is free |
| Kabeer dimension | NFHS-5 indicator (women 15-49) | India value |
|---|---|---|
| Resource | Has a bank or savings account she uses | 79% |
| Resource | Owns land alone or jointly | 32% (men 42%) |
| Resource | Has a mobile phone she uses | 54% |
| Agency | Participates in three household decisions (currently married) | 71% |
| Agency | Has money she alone decides how to use | 51% |
| Framework | Unit of analysis | Main question | Typical use today |
|---|---|---|---|
| WID (1970s) | Women | Are women included? | Sex-disaggregated data, women's components |
| WAD (late 1970s) | Class and the world economy | On what terms are women included? | Critique of export and wage models |
| GAD (1980s on) | Gender relations | Who has power, and how does it change? | Gender analysis of every programme |
| Moser (1989, 1993) | Roles and needs | Which needs does the plan meet? | Planning and project review |
| Kabeer (1999) | Choices | Can she make strategic life choices? | Indicator design and evaluation |
| Factor | Meaning | Why women often lose |
|---|---|---|
| Breakdown position | How well off each person would be if cooperation ended | Fewer assets, lower wages, weak exit options |
| Perceived interest | How much a person weighs her own well-being | Norms teach women to put the family first |
| Perceived contribution | How much a person is seen to contribute | Unpaid work is invisible, so seen as contributing less |
| Method | What it does | What it can show |
|---|---|---|
| Survey decision modules | Ask who decides on health, purchases, visits | Reported say, as in NFHS-5 Chapter 14 |
| Expenditure comparisons | Compare spending when income is in women's versus men's hands | Whether income is pooled |
| Randomised transfers | Assign the recipient (woman or man) at random | Causal effect of who receives the money |
| Lab-in-field games | Spouses make private and joint choices | Hidden income, trust, efficiency |
| Qualitative interviews | Narratives of decisions and disputes | Why and how, including norms |
| Measure | Definition | Latest India value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex ratio (overall) | Females per 1,000 males, all ages | 943 | Census 2011 |
| Child sex ratio | Girls per 1,000 boys aged 0-6 | 918 | Census 2011 |
| Sex ratio at birth (SRB) | Girls born per 1,000 boys born | 913 | SRS 2021 |
| Provision | Content |
|---|---|
| Section 6 | Prohibits pre-natal techniques, including ultrasound, for determining the sex of a foetus, and sex selection by any means |
| Registration | Every clinic with ultrasound must register and keep records |
| Penalties | Imprisonment up to three years and fines for a first offence, higher for repeat offences |
| Authorities | Appropriate authorities at state and district level inspect and prosecute |
| Country (2024) | Boys born per girl | Girls per 1,000 boys |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1.071 | 934 |
| Pakistan | 1.055 | 948 |
| Afghanistan | 1.051 | 951 |
| Maldives | 1.051 | 951 |
| Bangladesh | 1.049 | 953 |
| Nepal | 1.049 | 953 |
| Bhutan | 1.048 | 954 |
| Sri Lanka | 1.044 | 958 |
| Female LFPR, usual status, 15+ | 2017-18 | 2023-24 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural | 24.6% | 47.6% | +23.0 points |
| Urban | 20.4% | 28.0% | +7.6 points |
| All India | 23.3% | 41.7% | +18.4 points |
| Type of work (2025) | Men | Women | Women as % of men |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular wage or salaried (monthly) | Rs 24,217 | Rs 18,353 | 76% |
| Self-employed (monthly) | Rs 17,914 | Rs 6,374 | 36% |
| Casual labour other than public works (daily) | Rs 455 | Rs 315 | 69% |
| Problem | What goes wrong | Better practice |
|---|---|---|
| Proxy respondent | Husband reports wife as 'housewife' | Interview women directly where possible |
| Single question | 'Do you work?' misses unpaid family work | Ask activity by activity: livestock, farm, sales, home-based work |
| Short recall | Seasonal work missed | Use a 12-month recall alongside the last 7 days |
| Self-perception | Women do not call their own work 'work' | Use concrete activity lists |
| Interviewer norms | Interviewer assumes women do not work | Train and monitor; use female interviewers |
| Design element | Time-blind version | Time-aware version |
|---|---|---|
| Meetings | Mid-morning at the block office | In the village, at times women choose |
| Training | Five full days away | Short sessions over weeks, with child care |
| Public works | Same task norms for all | Worksite creche, nearby sites, flexible start |
| Infrastructure | Judged by cost per unit | Judged also by hours saved for women and girls |
| Monitoring | Attendance counts | Time-use module before and after |
| Barrier | Mechanism | Example response |
|---|---|---|
| Distance and safety | Parents fear for girls on the road | Bicycles for girls, transport, nearby secondary schools |
| Domestic work | Girls care for siblings and fetch water | Creches, water supply, school timings |
| Marriage | Schooling stops at marriage | Conditional transfers, enforcement of the child marriage law |
| Sanitation | No usable toilet at school | Separate functional toilets and menstrual supplies |
| Low returns | Few jobs for educated women nearby | Information on jobs, as in Jensen's study |
| Norm | Effect on men | Programme response |
|---|---|---|
| Men do not show weakness | Late care-seeking, untreated depression | Outreach through workplaces and men's groups |
| Men take risks | Injuries, substance use | Road safety, harm reduction |
| Men provide alone | Distress migration, debt stress | Social protection that counts both earners |
| Indicator (NFHS-5, ages 15-49) | Women | Men | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Literate | 72% | 84% | 12 points |
| 10 or more years of schooling | 41% | 50% | 9 points |
| Ever used the internet | 33% | 51% | 18 points |
| Anaemic | 57% | 25% | 32 points |
| Currently employed | 25% | 75% | 50 points |
| Section | What it provides |
|---|---|
| 8-9 | Protection Officers appointed by the state to assist women |
| 12 | Application to a Magistrate; first hearing ordinarily within three days, disposal within sixty days |
| 17 | Right to reside in the shared household, whether or not she owns it |
| 18-22 | Protection, residence, monetary, custody and compensation orders |
| 31 | Breach of a protection order: up to one year or fine up to Rs 20,000, or both |
| Offence | IPC section | BNS section |
|---|---|---|
| Cruelty by husband or his relatives | 498A | 85 (cruelty defined in 86) |
| Dowry death | 304B | 80 |
| Rape | 375 | 63 |
| Section | Requirement |
|---|---|
| 4 | Every employer must constitute an Internal Committee, presided over by a senior woman employee, with at least half its members women |
| 6 | District Officer constitutes a Local Committee for workplaces with fewer than ten workers, or where the complaint is against the employer |
| 9 | Complaint within three months of the incident, extendable by three months |
| 11(4) | Inquiry to be completed within ninety days |
| 26 | Employer's non-compliance: fine up to Rs 50,000 |
| Country | Law | Key feature |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act, 2010 | Civil protection orders; a 2020 study found no cases filed in a decade in some districts |
| Sri Lanka | Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, No. 34 of 2005 | Civil interim and full protection orders; amendments proposed |
| Pakistan | Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, 2010 (Act IV of 2010) | Three-member Inquiry Committee in every organisation and an Ombudsperson |
| India | PWDVA 2005; POSH Act 2013 | Civil remedies plus Internal and Local Committees |
| Study | Setting | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Chattopadhyay and Duflo, Econometrica 72(5), 2004 | Randomly reserved village council headships, West Bengal and Rajasthan | Women leaders invest more in goods women ask for, such as drinking water |
| Beaman, Duflo, Pande and Topalova, Science 335, 2012 | West Bengal villages with reserved leaders in 1998 and 2003 | Narrowed gender gap in parents' aspirations for children; girls spent more time in school and less on chores |
| Iyer, Mani, Mishra and Topalova, AEJ: Applied 4(4), 2012 | State timing of reservation | More documented crimes against women, driven mainly by greater reporting |
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| September 2023 | Parliament passes the 106th Amendment |
| 16 April 2026 | Government notifies the Act into force; seats still not reserved because Article 334A requires census and delimitation |
| 16-17 April 2026 | Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026, to advance implementation through earlier delimitation, is introduced and defeated in the Lok Sabha: 298 votes, short of the 352 needed |
| 1 March 2027 | Census reference date, with caste enumeration |
| After publication | Delimitation, then reservation takes effect |
| Site of voice | Gender question | Where to look |
|---|---|---|
| Gram Sabha | Do women attend and speak? | Attendance registers; Mahila Sabha minutes |
| Bureaucracy | Share of women in district posts | State cadre lists |
| Judiciary | Women judges and the treatment of women litigants | Court statistics |
| Unions and cooperatives | Women in leadership | Cooperative registers, union records |
| Programme committees | Women on school management, water and health committees | Programme MIS |
| Approach | What it does | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Men as clients | Services for men's health and well-being | Diverts funds from women's services |
| Men as partners | Couples' sessions, fathers in child care | Reinforces men as decision-makers |
| Men as agents of change | Group education on gender norms, men speaking against violence | Rewarding men for minimal change |
| Norm-changing | Questions the norms themselves with both sexes | Slow, needs skilled facilitation |
| Spousal physical or sexual violence (ever) | Value |
|---|---|
| Scheduled Caste women | 34.7% |
| Scheduled Tribe women | 31.8% |
| OBC women | 30.2% |
| Other women | 22.6% |
| Identity | Example of intersecting disadvantage | Data point to check |
|---|---|---|
| Religion | Muslim women's lower participation in paid work in some states | PLFS by religion |
| Disability | Women with disabilities face higher violence and lower schooling | NFHS-5 disability questions; Disability Inclusion 101 |
| Age | Widows' loss of land and status | Census marital status |
| Sexuality and gender identity | Transgender persons' exclusion from work and services | Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 |
| Migration | Wives of migrants managing farms without titles | PLFS migration modules |
| Framework | Core question | Best used for |
|---|---|---|
| Harvard Analytical Framework | Who does what, who has access to and control over which resources? | Project data collection: activity and access profiles |
| Moser framework | Which roles do women carry, and which practical and strategic needs does the plan meet? | Planning and policy review |
| Social Relations Approach (Kabeer) | How do institutions (household, community, market, state) produce inequality? | Institutional and power analysis |
| Gender Analysis Matrix | What changes for women, men, households and the community in labour, time, resources and culture? | Participatory review with communities |
| Activity or resource (dairy, Illustrative) | Women | Men | Who controls |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feeding and milking | Mostly | Sometimes | - |
| Taking milk to the collection centre | Sometimes | Mostly | - |
| Membership of the cooperative | Few | Most | Men |
| Milk payment | Rarely | Usually | Men |
| Decision to buy or sell an animal | Consulted | Decides | Men |
| Kabeer dimension | Indicator example | Data source |
|---|---|---|
| Resources | Share of programme assets titled to women | Programme records |
| Resources | Women's own income in the last month | Survey |
| Agency | Woman decides alone or jointly on use of her earnings | Survey using NFHS wording |
| Agency | Woman can visit the market or health facility alone | Survey using NFHS wording |
| Achievements | Girls' secondary completion; women's anaemia | Survey; health records |
| Norms | Agreement with reasons for wife beating, women and men | Survey using NFHS wording |
| Tool | Finding (Illustrative) | Design change |
|---|---|---|
| Activity profile | Men sell goats at the weekly market | Collective sales by the group, payment to women's accounts |
| Time use | Grazing adds about two hours a day | Stall-feeding and shared grazing rotations |
| Bargaining | Husbands may claim sale proceeds | Couples' sessions; goats registered in women's names |
| Intersection | Landless Dalit women lack fodder access | Fodder plots on common land, priority enrolment |
| Risk | Some disclosures of violence expected | Referral map, trained staff, POSH committee |
| Type | What it does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Gender-blind | Ignores gender differences | Training scheduled when women cannot attend |
| Gender-aware or sensitive | Recognises differences and adjusts delivery | Separate sessions for women |
| Gender-responsive | Meets women's specific needs | Creche at the worksite |
| Relation-changing | Changes the underlying relations and norms | Joint land titles plus community work on inheritance |
| Mistake | Why it happens | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| Counting women as the result | Easy to report | Measure what changed in their resources and agency |
| Assuming household pooling | Unitary model habit | Decide and record whose name is on the benefit |
| Ignoring time | Unpaid work is invisible | Estimate added hours; reduce other burdens |
| Treating women as one group | Simple categories | Disaggregate by caste, class, age, disability |
| Leaving out men | Fear of diluting focus | Work with men, accountable to women |
| Mixing data sources | Convenience | One source per comparison; state the definition |