Flagship Course • Free Forever

Causal Inference for Development: Designs, Estimators & Judgement

From Potential Outcomes to Practitioner Practice

A design-based course in causal inference for people who design, read, and commission impact evidence. It starts with the potential-outcomes model, works through the estimator toolkit from randomisation to synthetic control and causal machine learning, and ends with the practitioner's real job: judging which design a claim can bear. Built on Imbens and Rubin, Angrist and Pischke, and Cunningham, with cases from Indian programmes.

R & Stata Code Indian Cases Interactive Lexicon
13 Comprehensive Modules
~20 hours
R + Stata Throughout
South Asia Focus
Identification First

Why a Whole Course on Causal Inference?

Development practice runs on causal claims. A programme raised enrolment. A transfer cut stunting. A reform moved wages. Most of these claims are made from comparisons that cannot bear them. This course is about the gap between the comparison you can run and the one you actually need, and the designs that close it.

Where this sits. It goes one level past Econometrics 101, which introduces the methods. It carries the conceptual spine of the MEL flagship (counterfactual, attribution, contribution) into the estimators that operationalise it. If you have run a comparison and wondered whether it was honest, start here.

Identification before estimation

Every method is taught as an answer to one question: what has to be true for this comparison to recover a causal effect? The assumption comes first, the regression second.

Code you can run

R and Stata for each design, on data shapes you will actually meet: household surveys, programme rosters, district panels. Paired with the DevEconomics Toolkit's DiD, RDD, and synthetic control apps.

The buyer's seat

The final part is for the practitioner who commissions evidence rather than produces it: reading a results table, interrogating a design, and choosing what a claim can be made to bear.

"The most credible and influential research designs use random assignment… A constructive response to the credibility problem is to adopt designs that mimic randomised trials." — Joshua Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics (2009), p. 11

Assess Yourself — Causal Inference

Six auto-graded questions on the core ideas of the course. Pick an answer and check it; each explains the reasoning. Nothing is stored and there's no sign-in.

1The “fundamental problem of causal inference” refers to the fact that:Counterfactual Thinking
2Ice-cream sales and drowning deaths both rise in summer. The most plausible explanation for their correlation is:Correlation vs Causation
3A job-training programme lets people enrol voluntarily. Simply comparing enrollees' later wages with non-enrollees' wages tends to overstate the effect because:Selection Bias
4Random assignment to treatment and control groups helps identify a causal effect mainly because it:Randomisation & RCTs
5The key identifying assumption of a difference-in-differences design is that:Difference-in-Differences
6A scholarship is awarded only to students scoring above a fixed exam cutoff. A regression discontinuity design estimates its effect by:Regression Discontinuity

Papers & Resources

A short, opinionated reading list. The textbooks anchor the theory; the rest are the field's reference points for each design.

Core textbooks

Imbens & Rubin, Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (2015). Angrist & Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics (2009). Cunningham, Causal Inference: The Mixtape (2021, free online). Morgan & Winship, Counterfactuals and Causal Inference (2nd ed., 2014).

Sibling courses

Pairs with The Evidence Question (MEL) for the conceptual spine and Econometrics 101 for the entry-level treatment. The DevEconomics Toolkit ships interactive DiD, RDD, and synthetic control apps used in the worked examples.

The credibility debate

Banerjee & Duflo, Poor Economics (2011), against Deaton, "Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development" (JEL 2010) and Pritchett & Sandefur on external validity (2015). Read all three before Module 12.

Connected Resources

Practice the Material & Continue Learning

Every flagship course is part of a wider open-source learning network. The cards below cross-link this course with hands-on labs, the course lexicon, foundational 101 decks, book summaries, reference handouts, live dojos, and premium tools.

Practise · Lab
Sampling & Design Lab

Build the counterfactual by hand — assign treatment and control, size a sample for power, and see how design choices shape what you can identify.

Reference · Lexicon
Causal Inference Lexicon

Searchable definitions for the identification vocabulary — ATE, ATT and LATE, DiD, RDD, IV, propensity scores, parallel trends, and the SUTVA and ignorability assumptions.

Continue · 101 Series
Foundational 101 Decks

Free foundational primers that pair well with this flagship:

Read · BookSummaries
Field Companions

Interactive book companions across the ImpactMojo library — from Mostly Harmless Econometrics to Poor Economics — that deepen this flagship.

Reference · Handouts
Print-Friendly Reference Cards

85 print-optimised handouts across 10 tracks — methods, ethics, frameworks, lexicons, quick-reference cards.

Practise · Dojos
Live Practice Sessions

56 weekly dojo sessions in the South Asian dev-practitioner cohort — case clinics, paper discussions, live Q&A.

Upgrade · Premium
Premium Tools & Coaching

9 premium tools (live + coming soon) plus 1:1 coaching, cohort access, and certificates. Sliding-scale pricing.