ImpactMojo ImpactMojo
Membership

Data Feminism 101

Intersectionality, power, and justice in data practice
ImpactMojo Workshop Series • Challenging Data Narratives in South Asia
75-90 Minutes

Workshop 1: Foundations & power dynamics

Target Audience: Data analysts, researchers, development practitioners, policy makers, and anyone working with data in South Asian contexts

Prerequisites: Basic familiarity with data collection and analysis helpful but not required

Materials Needed: Laptops/tablets for data exploration, notebooks, sticky notes, flip chart paper

Learning objectives

By the end of this workshop, participants will be able to:

Part 1: What is Data Feminism? - Beyond numbers

20 minutes

Two stories from the same dataset

Government Report: "96.5% of people live in households with an improved drinking-water source (NFHS-6, 2023-24)."

Feminist Analysis: "An improved source can still be a walk away from home, and the figure says nothing about who fetches the water, how far, or how often. Time-use data points to who: on the survey day, 81.5% of women and girls aged 6 and above did unpaid domestic work, against 27.1% of men and boys (Time Use Survey 2024)."

Same data, different questions, different insights.

What makes data analysis "feminist"?

Traditional data practice

  • Goal: Objective truth through numbers
  • Method: Standardized, "neutral" approaches
  • Voice: Expert/institutional perspective
  • Analysis: Aggregate patterns, averages
  • Questions: "What happened?" "How much?"

Feminist data practice

  • Goal: Justice and equity through evidence
  • Method: Contextual, power-aware approaches
  • Voice: Centering marginalized experiences
  • Analysis: Disaggregation, intersectionality
  • Questions: "Who benefits?" "Who's missing?"

Core principles of Data Feminism

1. Examine power

Who collects data? Who analyzes it? Who gets to decide what counts as "data"?

2. Challenge power

Use data to challenge existing hierarchies rather than reinforcing them.

3. Elevate emotion & embodiment

Value experiential knowledge alongside statistical evidence.

4. Rethink binaries

Move beyond male/female, urban/rural to understand complex identities.

5. Embrace pluralism

Multiple perspectives lead to better understanding than single "objective" view.

6. Consider context

Numbers don't exist in vacuum - historical, cultural, political context matters.

7. Make labor visible

Acknowledge who does the work of data collection and cleaning - often invisible.

Part 2: Power and positionality in data

25 minutes

Who gets counted? The politics of data collection

Data Area Who's Typically Counted Who's Often Missing Why It Matters
Economic Surveys Formal sector workers, heads of household Informal workers, women's unpaid labor, care work Underestimates women's economic contribution
Health Studies Cisgender adults, urban populations LGBTQIA+ people, children, migrant workers Health interventions miss vulnerable groups
Education Data Enrolled students in formal schools Out-of-school children, disability, caste discrimination Policies don't address systemic exclusion
Violence Statistics Reported crimes, police data Domestic violence, caste violence, police violence Underrepresents actual prevalence and patterns

Power mapping exercise (15 minutes)

Small Groups (3-4 people):

Step 1 (5 min): Choose one dataset you use in your work (surveys, admin data, monitoring data)

Step 2 (7 min): Map the power dynamics:

  • Who decided what questions to ask?
  • Who collected the data? What was their relationship to respondents?
  • Who was included/excluded in the sample?
  • Who analyzes and interprets the results?
  • Who makes decisions based on this data?

Step 3 (3 min): Identify one way this power dynamic might bias your understanding

Report Back: Each group shares one insight about hidden power structures in their data

Intersectionality in data practice

Intersectionality: People experience multiple, overlapping forms of discrimination and advantage. Data analysis has to capture this complexity instead of looking at single categories in isolation.

Case study: Maternal mortality in Rajasthan

Aggregate Data: "Maternal mortality ratio is 164 per 100,000 live births (Sample Registration System, 2016-18)"

Intersectional Analysis Asks, and the official series cannot answer:

  • Rural Dalit women: no published estimate, because SRS does not report maternal mortality by caste
  • Urban upper-caste women: no published estimate, so the gap with rural Dalit women cannot be measured
  • Young tribal women (under 20): no published estimate by age and tribe together
  • Women with disabilities: no published estimate

Insight: Caste, geography, age, and ability may intersect to create very different maternal health risks, but an official series that is not disaggregated keeps those differences invisible. Generic "maternal health" interventions may then miss those at highest risk.

Part 3: Questioning the data we take for granted

20 minutes

The construction of categories

Category critique activity (12 minutes)

Individual Reflection (5 min): Look at a dataset you know well. Pick one categorical variable (gender, occupation, religion, etc.)

Ask These Questions:

  • Who decided these categories were the "right" ones?
  • What experiences or identities do these categories miss?
  • How might someone's answer change based on who's asking the question?
  • What would happen if categories were designed by the people being studied?

Pair Discussion (5 min): Share your analysis with a partner

Large Group (2 min): Quick insights about hidden assumptions in data categories

Beyond the binary: Rethinking data categories

Traditional categories

  • Gender: Male/Female
  • Location: Urban/Rural
  • Work: Employed/Unemployed
  • Education: Literate/Illiterate
  • Marital Status: Married/Single

Feminist alternatives

  • Gender: Male/Female/Non-binary/Prefer not to say + Gender expression
  • Location: Urban/Peri-urban/Rural + Migration status + Tenure security
  • Work: Formal/Informal/Unpaid care/Seeking work + Work quality
  • Education: Years + Skills + Cultural knowledge + Learning opportunities
  • Relationships: Multiple forms of partnership, care arrangements

Part 4: Making data practice more feminist

15 minutes

Practical steps for feminist data analysis

Remember: Feminist data practice keeps quantitative methods and uses them more thoughtfully and equitably.

Before You Start Analysis:

During Analysis:

When Presenting Results:

Summary

Data always reflects the priorities and assumptions of the people who collected it. Feminist data practice examines those choices and uses data to reduce inequality.

Resources for continued learning

Essential Reading:

South Asian Context:

Practical Tools:

Next Steps in ImpactMojo: